David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 7 (1):47 – 58 (1997)
Graham compares Kung?sun Lung's ?White Horse not Horse? [Graham, A.C. (1990) Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature (Albany, SUNY Press)] loith the use of a synecdoche in English, ?Sword is not Blade?. The Blade as part stands in here for the whole which is the Sword. But just as Sword as ?hilt plus blade? is more than blade, then via analogia, White Horse as ?white plus horse? is more than the part that is just ?horse?. Graham had taken over this Part/Whole argument from Chad Hansen who argues that since Chinese does not require the word ma for ?horse/horses? to be used with prefixed articles or numerals, ma is a ?mass?noun? similar to certain English mass?nouns like ?sand? which also has no plural form unlike the count?noun ?horse? [Hansen, Chad, (1983) Language and Logic in Ancient China (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press)]. Hansen then equates ?White Horse is not Horse? to the Mohist argument for ?Ox Horse is not Horse?. Ox?Horse is a ?mixed herd? of Ox and Horse that is not (just) that part that is Horse. The same it is with the mass?sum that is White Horse. It is like saying in English ?White Sand is not Sand?. Sand being this spread of sand on the beach, it is more than just a patch of that beach that is white. But this attribution of a Part/Whole logic to Kung?sun Lung runs up against a basic dictum stated in his thesis on ?Pointing and Thing?. There it is noted how all things can be pointed out except thing itself because the word ?thing? leaves nothing to exclude for it to be stand out. Since that thesis is derived from the law of the excluded middle where a thing is either X or not X, it is not possible for Kung?sun Lung to subscribe to a Part/Whole logic which basically argues for a thing being both X and not X
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
K. D. White (1992). The Horse in the Roman World Ann Hyland: Equus: The Horse in the Roman World. Pp. Xii + 285; 31 Plates. London: Batsford, 1990. £25. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (01):122-124.
Chris Fraser, School of Names. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Kirill Ole Thompson (1995). When a "White Horse" is Not a "Horse". Philosophy East and West 45 (4):481-499.
Bo Mou (2007). A Double-Reference Account: Gongsun Long's "White-Horse-Not-Horse" Thesis. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34 (4):493-513.
M. O. U. BO (2007). A Double-Reference Account: Gongsun Long's "White-Horse-Not-Horse" Thesis. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34 (4):493–513.
Chad Hansen (2007). Prolegomena to Future Solutions to "White-Horse Not Horse". Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34 (4):473–491.
Chad D. Hansen (1976). Mass Nouns and "a White Horse is Not a Horse". Philosophy East and West 26 (2):189-209.
Im Manyul (2007). Horse-Parts, White-Parts, and Naming: Semantics, Ontology, and Compound Terms in the White Horse Dialogue. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (2):167-185.
Chung-ying Cheng (1983). Kung-Sun Lung: White Horse and Other Issues. Philosophy East and West 33 (4):341-354.
Whalen Lai (1995). White Horse Not Horse: Making Sense of a Negative Logic. Asian Philosophy 5 (1):59 – 74.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #122,977 of 1,140,344 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,127 of 1,140,344 )
How can I increase my downloads?