Udayana's refutation of the buddhist thesis of momentariness in the ātmatattvaviveka
Journal of Indian Philosophy 26 (1):51-97 (1998)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid Montalvo (1999). The Buddhist Empiricism Thesis: An Extensive Critique. Asian Philosophy 9 (1):51 – 70.
Roy W. Perrett (2004). The Momentariness of Simples. Philosophy 79 (3):435-445.
Chakravathi Ram-Prasad (2011). The Phenomenal Separateness of Self: Udayana on Body and Agency. Asian Philosophy 21 (3):323 - 340.
Jeson Woo (2001). Incompatibility and the Proof of the Buddhist Theory of Momentariness. Journal of Indian Philosophy 29 (4):423-434.
Jason W. Brown (1999). Microgenesis and Buddhism: The Concept of Momentariness. Philosophy East and West 49 (3):261-277.
Rita Gupta (1980). The Buddhist Doctrine of Momentariness and its Presuppositions. Journal of Indian Philosophy 8 (1).
Taisei Shida (2011). Hypothesis-Generating Logic in Udayana's Rational Theology. Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):503-520.
Joy Laine (1993). Some Remarks on the Gu $\Underset{\Raise0.3em\Hbox{$\Underset{\Raise0.3em\Hbox{\Smash{\Scriptscriptstyle\Cdot}$}}{N} $}}{N} " />Agu $\Underset{\Raise0.3em\Hbox{$\Underset{\Raise0.3em\Hbox{\Smash{\Scriptscriptstyle\Cdot}$}}{N} $}}{N} " />Ibhedabha _boxclose\Dot Nga Chapter in Udayana's Ātmatattvaviveka. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 21 (3).
Udayanācārya (1987). Ātmatattvaviveka of Udayana: Text and Translation, with Notes. Eastern Book Linkers.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads13 ( #87,931 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
