David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
New Law Journal 152:1272 (2002)
Airedale NHS Trust v Bland establishes three principles among which is the controversial idea that people in a PVS, though not dying, have no best interests and no meaningful life. Accordingly, it is argued, they may have their food and fluids, whether delivered by tube or manually, removed, with the result that they die. Laing challenges this view arguing that not only is this bad medical science, it is unjustly discriminatory and at odds with our duties to the severely disabled. Laing highlights research by Keith Andrews et al and points out that Andrew Devine, in the same Hillsborough disaster, woke up some years after Tony Bland was decided.(Post script) Laing argues elsewhere that after the Mental Capacity Act 2005 the case has become a dangerous springboard for new third parties' to require the removal of food and fluids from the vulnerable incapacitated.
|Keywords||Persistent Vegetative State Withdrawing and witholding treatment euthanasia|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jacqueline A. Laing (2004). Disabled Need Our Protection. Law Society Gazette 101:12.
Lois L. Shepherd (2009). If That Ever Happens to Me: Making Life and Death Decisions After Terri Schiavo. University of North Carolina Press.
Jukka Varelius (2013). Pascal's Wager and Deciding About the Life-Sustaining Treatment of Patients in Persistent Vegetative State. Neuroethics 6 (2):277-285.
Jim Stone (2007). Pascal's Wager and the Persistent Vegetative State. Bioethics 21 (2):84–92.
Gastone G. Celesia (1997). Persistent Vegetative State: Clinical and Ethical Issues. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (3).
Thomas A. Mappes (2003). Persistent Vegetative State, Prospective Thinking, and Advance Directives. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):119-139.
Peter Singer, The Pope Moves Backward on Terminal Care Free Inquiry , 24, No. 5 (Aug/Sep 2004), Pp. 19-20.
Jacqueline A. Laing (2003). Life and Death in Healthcare Ethics: A Short Introduction: H Watt. Routledge, 2000, Pound7.99, Vii + 97pp. ISBN 0-415-21574-. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2):122-122.
Jacqueline A. Laing (2008). Food and Fluids: Human Law, Human Rights and Human Interests. In C. Tollefsen (ed.), Artificial Nutrition and Hydration. Springer Press. 77--100.
Nicholas Shea & Tim Bayne (2010). The Vegetative State and the Science of Consciousness. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (3):459.
K. R. Mitchell, I. H. Kerridge & T. J. Lovat (1993). Medical Futility, Treatment Withdrawal and the Persistent Vegetative State. Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (2):71-76.
P. Schotsmans (1993). The Patient in a Persistent Vegetative State: An Ethical Re-Appraisal. Bijdragen, Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie En Theologie 54 (1):2-18.
A. J. Fenwick (1999). Best Interests in Persistent Vegetative State. Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (1):59-60.
J. A. Stewart (1998). Best Interests and Persistent Vegetative State. Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (5):350-350.
Jacqueline A. Laing (2004). Mental Capacity Bill - A Threat to the Vulnerable. New Law Journal 154:1165.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-09-15
Total downloads1 ( #402,963 of 1,096,462 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #238,630 of 1,096,462 )
How can I increase my downloads?