David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (4):325-337 (2007)
In Daoist philosophy, the self is understood as an individual interdependent with others, and situated within a broader environment. Within this framework, the concept ziran is frequently understood in terms of naturalness or nature while wuwei is explained in terms of non-oppressive government. In many existing accounts, little is done to connect these two key Daoist concepts. Here, I suggest that wuwei and ziran are correlated, ethical, concepts. Together, they provide a unifying ethical framework for understanding the philosophy of the Daodejing. I explore the meaning of ziran as self-so-ness or, in human terms, as pertaining to an individualâs spontaneity. The appropriate response to the spontaneity of individuals is to avoid, insofar as possible, imposing or using restrictive norms and methods, that is, wuwei. According to this view, ziran and wuwei offer an account of ethics that attends to core notions of interdependent selfhood, including mutuality, relationality, interdependence, symbiosis, and responsiveness
|Keywords||Daoist philosophy Environmental philosophy Environmental ethics ziran wuwei|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Chad Hansen (1992). A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
Edward G. Slingerland (2003). Effortless Action: Wu-Wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. Oxford University Press.
Benjamin I. Schwartz (1985). The World of Thought in Ancient China. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Karyn L. Lai (2006). Li in the "Analects": Training in Moral Comptence and the Question of Flexibility. Philosophy East and West 56 (1):69 - 83.
Mark Csikszentmihalyi & P. J. Ivanhoe (1999). Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
Steven Burik (2010). Self and Other: Continental and Classical Chinese Thought. Philosophy Compass 5 (9):735-744.
Similar books and articles
Guy Burneko (2004). Ecohumanism: The Spontaneities of the Earth, Ziran, and K =. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 31 (2):183–194.
R. P. Peerenboom (1991). Beyond Naturalism: A Reconstruction of Daoist Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 13 (1):3-22.
Ann A. Pang-White (2009). Nature, Interthing Intersubjectivity, and the Environment: A Comparative Analysis of Kant and Daoism. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (1):61-78.
Brian J. Bruya (2010). The Rehabilitation of Spontaneity: A New Approach in Philosophy of Action. Philosophy East and West 60 (2):pp. 207-250.
Sung-Hae Kim (2008). The Immortal World. Environmental Ethics 30 (2):135-157.
Peipei Qiu (2001). Onitsura's Makoto and the Daoist Concept of the Natural. Philosophy East and West 51 (2):232-246.
Alan Fox (1996). Reflex and Reflectivity:Wuweiin theZhuangzi. Asian Philosophy 6 (1):59-72.
Jianliang Xu (2009). The Universal Sentiment of Daoist Morality. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):524-536.
Alex Feldt (2010). Governing Through the Dao: A Non-Anarchistic Interpretation of the Laozi. [REVIEW] Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (3):323-337.
Karyn L. Lai (2003). Conceptual Foundations for Environmental Ethics: A Daoist Perspective. Environmental Ethics 25 (3):247-266.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads65 ( #65,922 of 1,907,383 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #42,629 of 1,907,383 )
How can I increase my downloads?