More on how and why: cause and effect in biology revisited

Biology and Philosophy 28 (5):719-745 (2013)
Abstract
In 1961, Ernst Mayr published a highly influential article on the nature of causation in biology, in which he distinguished between proximate and ultimate causes. Mayr argued that proximate causes (e.g. physiological factors) and ultimate causes (e.g. natural selection) addressed distinct ‘how’ and ‘why’ questions and were not competing alternatives. That distinction retains explanatory value today. However, the adoption of Mayr’s heuristic led to the widespread belief that ontogenetic processes are irrelevant to evolutionary questions, a belief that has (1) hindered progress within evolutionary biology, (2) forged divisions between evolutionary biology and adjacent disciplines and (3) obstructed several contemporary debates in biology. Here we expand on our earlier (Laland et al. in Science 334:1512–1516, 2011) argument that Mayr’s dichotomous formulation has now run its useful course, and that evolutionary biology would be better served by a concept of reciprocal causation, in which causation is perceived to cycle through biological systems recursively. We further suggest that a newer evolutionary synthesis is unlikely to emerge without this change in thinking about causation
Keywords Niche construction  Nongenetic inheritance  Evo-devo  Cultural evolution
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 22 references

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Ernst Mayr (1972). Lamarck Revisited. Journal of the History of Biology 5 (1):55 - 94.
Franklin G. Miller (2005). William James, Faith, and the Placebo Effect. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48 (2):273-281.
Jim Good & Jim Garrison (2011). Dewey, Hegel, and Causation. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (2):101-120.
Mikuláš Teich (2007). Haldane and Lysenko Revisited. Journal of the History of Biology 40 (3):557 - 563.
Diane B. Paul (1987). "Our Load of Mutations" Revisited. Journal of the History of Biology 20 (3):321 - 335.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-08-07

Total downloads

39 ( #41,350 of 1,096,498 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #34,641 of 1,096,498 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.