Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):350-351 (2004)
|Abstract||In light of an historical obsession with human error, Krueger & Funder (K&F) suggest that social psychologists should emphasize the strengths of social perception. In our view, however, absolute levels of accuracy (or error) in any given experiment are less important than underlying processes. We discuss the use of the process-dissociation procedure for gaining insight into the mechanisms underlying accuracy and error.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gilbert Harman (1999). Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99:315 - 331.
Justin Kruger & Kenneth Savitsky (2004). The “Reign of Error” in Social Psychology: On the Real Versus Imagined Consequences of Problem-Focused Research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):349-350.
Keith E. Stanovich (2004). Balance in Psychological Research: The Dual Process Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):357-358.
Joachim I. Krueger & David C. Funder (2004). Towards a Balanced Social Psychology: Causes, Consequences, and Cures for the Problem-Seeking Approach to Social Behavior and Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):313-327.
Richard Joyce (2011). The Error In 'The Error In The Error Theory'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):519-534.
George A. Peters (2006). Human Error: Causes and Control. Crc/Taylor & Francis.
R. P. Farrell & C. A. Hooker (2009). Error, Error-Statistics and Self-Directed Anticipative Learning. Foundations of Science 14 (4).
Richard E. Petty (2004). Multi-Process Models in Social Psychology Provide a More Balanced View of Social Thought and Action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):353-354.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #99,523 of 549,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?