Four varieties of the logical positivists' doctrine of necessary truth
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 35 (4):512-533 (1975)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNoriaki Iwasa (2011). That Truth Exists is More Logical. Think 10 (27):109-112.
Mario Gómez-torrente (1998). Logical Truth and Tarskian Logical Truth. Synthese 117 (3):375-408.
Steve Fuller (2006). Review Essay: The Philosophical Buck Stops Here. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (3):355-366.
Carl G. Hempel (1935). On the Logical Positivists' Theory of Truth. Analysis 2 (4):49 - 59.
Marc Lange (2005). A Counterfactual Analysis of the Concepts of Logical Truth and Necessity. Philosophical Studies 125 (3):277 - 303.
Matti Eklund (2010). Rejectionism About Truth. In Cory D. Wright & Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (eds.), New Waves in Truth. Palgrave Macmillan.
Michael Friedman (1995). Poincaré's Conventionalism and the Logical Positivists. Foundations of Science 1 (2).
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1990). Quine's Relativism. Ratio 3 (2):142-149.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,830 of 549,084 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
