Is Popper's falsificationist heuristic a helpful resource for developing critical thinking?
Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (4):432–448 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAlfred Schramm (2006). Methodological Objectivism and Critical Rationalist ’Induction’. In Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford & David Miller (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, Volume II. Ashgate.
Stefania Ruzsits Jha (2006). The Bid to Transcend Popper, and the Lakatos-Polanyi Connection. Perspectives on Science 14 (3):318-346.
Kal Alston (2001). Re/Thinking Critical Thinking: The Seductions of Everyday Life. Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (1):27-40.
Bruce Caldwell (2005). Recovering Popper: For the Left? Critical Review 17 (1-2):49-68.
Christine M. Cress (2003). Critical Thinking Development in Service-Learning Activities. Inquiry 23 (1-2):87-93.
Peter Bradley (2010). Teaching Modeling in Critical Thinking. Teaching Philosophy 33 (2):123-147.
Jennifer Wilson Mulnix (2010). Thinking Critically About Critical Thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (5):464-479.
Carlos Saiz (2010). Critical Thinking. Inquiry 25 (2):19-26.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,483 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
