Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):416-417 (2003)
|Abstract||“Psychological relativity” means that “an observation is a relationship between the observer and the event observed.” It implies a profound distinction between “the internal first-person as opposed to the external third-person perspective.” That distinction, followed through, turns Lehar's discourse inside-out. This commentary elaborates the notion of “psychological relativity,” shows that whereas there is already a natural science of perceptual report, there cannot also be a science of perception per se, and draws out some implications for our understanding of phenomenal consciousness.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mario Bacelar Valente, Did the Concepts of Space and Time Change That Much with the 1905 Theory of Relativity?
P. W. Bridgman (1967). A Sophisticate's Primer of Relativity. London, Routledge & K. Paul.
Nicholas Maxwell (1988). Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Compatible? Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.
Hajnal Andréka, Judit X. Madarász, István Németi & Gergely Székely, A Logic Road From Special to General Relativity.
Henry Margenau & Richard A. Mould (1957). Relativity: An Epistemological Appraisal. Philosophy of Science 24 (4):297-307.
James Mattingly (2001). Singularities and Scalar Fields: Matter Theory and General Relativity. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S395-.
Harald Nordenson (1969). Relativity, Time and Reality: A Critical Investigation of the Einstein Theory of Relativity From a Logical Point of View. London, Allen & Unwin.
Kent A. Peacock (1992). A New Look at Simultaneity. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:542 - 552.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #178,675 of 549,078 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,078 )
How can I increase my downloads?