A Flea on Schroedinger's Cat
| Abstract | We propose a technical reformulation of the measurement problem of quantum mechanics, which is based on the postulate that the final state of a measurement is classical; this accords with experimental practice as well as with Bohr's views. Unlike the usual formulation (in which the post-measurement state is a a unit vector in Hilbert space, such as a wave-function), our version actually admits a purely technical solution within the confines of conventional quantum theory (as opposed to solutions that either modify this theory, or introduce unusual and controversial interpretative rules and/or ontologies). To that effect, we recall a remarkable phenomenon in the theory of Schroedinger operators (discovered in 1981 by Jona-Lasinio, Martinelli, and Scoppola), according to which the ground state of a symmetric double-well Hamiltonian (which is paradigmatically of Schroedinger's Cat type) becomes exponentially sensitive to tiny perturbations of the potential as h -> 0. We show that this instability emerges also from the textbook WKB approximation, extend it to time-dependent perturbations, and study the dynamical transition from the ground state of the double well to the perturbed ground state (in which the cat is typically either dead or alive, depending on the details of the perturbation). Numerical simulations show that, in an individual experiment, certain (especially adiabatically rising) perturbations may (quite literally) cause the collapse of the wavefunction in the classical limit. Thus we combine the technical and conceptual virtues of dynamical collapse models a la GRW (which do solve the measurement problem) with those of decoherence (in that our perturbations come from the environment) without sharing their drawbacks: although single measurement outcomes are obtained (instead of merely diagonal reduced density matrices), no modification of quantum mechanics is needed | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesP. N. & Robin Reuvers (2013). A Flea on Schrödinger's Cat. Foundations of Physics 43 (3):373-407.
Nicholas Maxwell (1972). A New Look at the Quantum Mechanical Problem of Measurement. American Journal of Physics 40:1431-5..
Jeffrey Barrett, Everett's Relative-State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Valia Allori (2013). On the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics. In Soazig Lebihan (ed.), Precis de la Philosophie de la Physique. Vuibert.
Abraham D. Stone (1994). Does the Bohm Theory Solve the Measurement Problem? Philosophy of Science 61 (2):250-266.
Nicholas Maxwell (1975). Does the Minimal Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Resolve the Measurement Problem? Methodology and Science 8:84-101.
Frank Arntzenius (1993). How to Discover That the Real is Unreal. Erkenntnis 38 (2):191 - 202.
Paul Teller (1984). The Projection Postulate: A New Perspective. Philosophy of Science 51 (3):369-395.
Jeffrey Bub (1988). From Micro to Macro: A Solution to the Measurement Problem of Quantum Mechanics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:134 - 144.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-10-12Total downloads3 ( #203,804 of 556,803 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,803 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
