Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 71 (2):205-215 (2004)
|Abstract||Myrvold (2003) has proposed an attractive Bayesian account of why theories that unify phenomena tend to derive greater epistemic support from those phenomena than do theories that fail to unify them. It is argued, however, that "unification" in Myrvold's sense is both too easy and too difficult for theories to achieve. Myrvold's account fails to capture what it is that makes unification sometimes count in a theory's favor.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Harvey R. Brown, Wayne Myrvold & Jos Uffink (2009). Boltzmann's H-Theorem, its Discontents, and the Birth of Statistical Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (2):174-191.
Wayne C. Myrvold (1995). Peirce on Cantor's Paradox and the Continuum. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 31 (3):508 - 541.
Michael Strevens (2004). The Causal and Unification Approaches to Explanation Unified—Causally. Noûs 38 (1):154–176.
Wayne C. Myrvold (2011). Statistical Mechanics and Thermodynamics: A Maxwellian View. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 42 (4):237-243.
Todd Jones (1998). Unification, Deduction, and History: A Reply to Steel. Philosophy of Science 65 (4):672-681.
Wayne C. Myrvold (1996). Bayesianism and Diverse Evidence: A Reply to Andrew Wayne. Philosophy of Science 63 (4):661-665.
Jonah N. Schupbach (2005). On a Bayesian Analysis of the Virtue of Unification. Philosophy of Science 72 (4):594-607.
Wayne C. Myrvold (2003). A Bayesian Account of the Virtue of Unification. Philosophy of Science 70 (2):399-423.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #65,500 of 740,223 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,223 )
How can I increase my downloads?