Graduate studies at Western
Philosophia Mathematica 13 (1):1-43 (2005)
|Abstract||The aim of this paper is to put into context the historical, foundational and philosophical significance of category theory. We use our historical investigation to inform the various category-theoretic foundational debates and to point to some common elements found among those who advocate adopting a foundational stance. We then use these elements to argue for the philosophical position that category theory provides a framework for an algebraic in re interpretation of mathematical structuralism. In each context, what we aim to show is that, whatever the significance of category theory, it need not rely upon any set-theoretic underpinning.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
Thomas Bittner, Maureen Donnelly & Barry Smith (2004). Individuals, Universals, Collections: On the Foundational Relations of Ontology. In Achille Varzi & Laure Vieu (eds.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings of the Third International Conference, 37–48. IOS Press.
Alberto Peruzzi (2006). The Meaning of Category Theory for 21st Century Philosophy. Axiomathes 16 (4):424-459.
Makmiller Pedroso (2009). On Three Arguments Against Categorical Structuralism. Synthese 170 (1):21 - 31.
Jose Ferreiros (2001). The Road to Modern Logic-an Interpretation. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):441-484.
Elaine Landry (2011). How to Be a Structuralist All the Way Down. Synthese 179 (3):435 - 454.
Jean-Pierre Marquis (1995). Category Theory and the Foundations of Mathematics: Philosophical Excavations. Synthese 103 (3):421 - 447.
Elaine Landry (1999). Category Theory: The Language of Mathematics. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):27.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads61 ( #18,965 of 754,610 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #27,287 of 754,610 )
How can I increase my downloads?