Philosophy of Science 66 (3):27 (1999)
|Abstract||In this paper I argue that category theory ought to be seen as providing the language for mathematical discourse. Against foundational approaches, I argue that there is no need to reduce either the content or structure of mathematical concepts and theories to the constituents of either the universe of sets or the category of categories. I assign category theory the role of organizing what we say about the content and structure of both mathematical concepts and theories. Insofar, then, as the structuralist sees mathematics as talking about structures and their morphology, I contend that category theory furnishes a framework for mathematical structuralism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
F. A. Muller (2001). Sets, Classes, and Categories. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):539-573.
Makmiller Pedroso (2009). On Three Arguments Against Categorical Structuralism. Synthese 170 (1):21 - 31.
Geoffrey Hellman (2003). Does Category Theory Provide a Framework for Mathematical Structuralism? Philosophia Mathematica 11 (2):129-157.
Elaine Landry & Jean-Pierre Marquis (2005). Categories in Context: Historical, Foundational, and Philosophical. Philosophia Mathematica 13 (1):1-43.
Andrei Rodin (2011). Categories Without Structures. Philosophia Mathematica 19 (1):20-46.
Andrei Rodin, Toward a Hermeneutic Categorical Mathematics or Why Category Theory Does Not Support Mathematical Structuralism.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #26,127 of 549,014 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,014 )
How can I increase my downloads?