David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):531-543 (2009)
In the perception of technology innovation two world views compete for domination: technological and social determinism. Technological determinism holds that societal change is caused by technological developments, social determinism holds the opposite. Although both were quite central to discussion in the philosophy, history and sociology of technology in the 1970s and 1980s, neither is seen as mainstream now. They do still play an important role as background philosophies in societal debates and offer two very different perspectives on where the responsibilities for an ethically sound development of novel technologies lie. In this paper we will elaborate on these to two opposing views on technology development taking the recent debate on the implementation of biofuels as a case example.
|Keywords||Technological determinism Social determinism Social constructivism Technology Innovation Biofuels Public debate|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Philip J. Vergragt (2013). Beyond Politization of Technology and Sustainability: A Plea for Visioning. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 18 (2):361-365.
Wade Rowland (2005). Recognizing the Role of the Modern Business Corporation in the "Social Construction" of Technology. Social Epistemology 19 (2 & 3):287 – 313.
Neelke Doorn (2012). Responsibility Ascriptions in Technology Development and Engineering: Three Perspectives. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):69-90.
Dane Scott (2011). The Technological Fix Criticisms and the Agricultural Biotechnology Debate. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):207-226.
Ilkka Niiniluoto (1990). Should Technological Imperatives Be Obeyed? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):181 – 189.
Ruth Mampuys & Frans W. A. Brom (2010). The Quiet Before the Storm: Anticipating Developments in Synthetic Biology. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (3):151-168.
Neelke Doorn (2010). A Procedural Approach to Distributing Responsibilities in R&D Networks. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (3):169-188.
Erik Paredis (2011). Sustainability Transitions and the Nature of Technology. Foundations of Science 16 (2):195-225.
Philip Boucher (2011). What Next After Determinism in the Ontology of Technology? Distributing Responsibility in the Biofuel Debate. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):525-538.
Added to index2009-07-27
Total downloads7 ( #147,371 of 1,010,394 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?