David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dialogue 51 (3):437-466 (2012)
In Dalton Conley argues that inequalities between siblings are larger than inequalities at the level of the overall society. Our article discusses the normative implications for institutions of this observation. We show that the question of state intervention for curbing intra-family inequality reveals an internal tension within liberalism between autonomy and toleration, which bears on the forms that the intervention of institutions may take. Despite the pros and cons of both commitments, autonomy-based liberalism appears more compatible with the involvement of the state for egalitarian reasons within the family than toleration-based liberalism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
G. A. Cohen (1989). On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics 99 (4):906-944.
Richard J. Arneson (1989). Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophical Studies 56 (1):77 - 93.
G. A. Cohen (1997). Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1):3–30.
Harry Brighouse & Adam Swift (2006). Parents' Rights and the Value of the Family. Ethics 117 (1):80-108.
William A. Galston (1995). Two Concepts of Liberalism. Ethics 105 (3):516-534.
Citations of this work BETA
Pauline Kleingeld & Joel Anderson (2014). Justice as a Family Value: How a Commitment to Fairness is Compatible with Love. Hypatia 29 (2):320-336.
Similar books and articles
Xavier Landes & Morten Ebbe Juul Nielsen (2012). Intra-Family Inequality and Justice—ERRATUM. Dialogue 51 (3):537-537.
Brian Penrose (2000). Must the Family Be Just? Philosophical Papers 29 (3):189-221.
Veronique Munoz-Darde (1999). Is the Family to Be Abolished Then? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1):37-56.
Alexandra Dobra (2011). OKIN's FEMINIST CHALLENGE TO RAWLS's THEORY OF JUSTICE. FROM THEORY TO PUBLIC ACTION. Studia Philosophica (1):51-64.
Alexandra Dobra (2011). OKIN's FEMINIST CHALLENGE TO RAWLS's THEORY OF JUSTICE. FROM THEORY TO PUBLIC ACTION. Studia UBB Philosophia (1):52-64.
Anne Alstott, Is the Family at Odds with Equality? The Legal Implications of the Egalitarian Family.
Francis Schrag (1976). Justice and the Family. Inquiry 19 (1-4):193 – 208.
Wlodek Rabinowicz (2003). The Size of Inequality and Its Badness Some Reflections Around Temkin's Inequality. Theoria 69 (1-2):60-84.
Martha Minow & Mary Lyndon Shanley (1996). Relational Rights and Responsibilities: Revisioning the Family in Liberal Political Theory and Law. Hypatia 11 (1):4 - 29.
Matthew Lister (2010). Immigration, Association, and the Family. Law and Philosophy 29 (6):717-745.
Sandra Berns (2005). Liberalism and the Privatised Family: The Legacy of Rousseau. Res Publica 11 (2):125-155.
Blain Neufeld (2009). Coercion, the Basic Structure, and the Family. Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (1):37-54.
Antonio Di Lorenzo (2013). Reassessment of Leggett Inequality. Foundations of Physics 43 (5):685-698.
Matthew J. Lister (2007). A Rawlsian Argument for Extending Family-Based Immigration Benefits to Same-Sex Couples. University of Memphis Law Review 37 (Summer):763-764.
Larry S. Temkin (1986). Inequality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (2):99-121.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-10-01
Total downloads1 ( #771,748 of 1,793,096 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,412 of 1,793,096 )
How can I increase my downloads?