Kerry Langer says

Abstract
Certainly I am in no way opposed to philosophy, or metaphysics in the sense that Wm. James defined it as a particularly intense effort to think clearly. Indeed, Klein would like to say that what I am talking about is nothing but metaphysics. But the kind of philosophy/metaphysics that is needed here is of a particular kind: a kind that does not separate philosophy/metaphysics and physics into two disjoint realms. It is of the kind that seeks to construct useful testable physical theories that are adequately connected to what we can know
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,731
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Eva Picardi (1994). Kerry und Frege über Begriff und Gegenstand. History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (1):9-32.
Monika Langer (1990). Merleau-Ponty's Ontology. Review of Metaphysics 44 (1):136-137.
Walter B. Gulick (2009). Polanyi and Langer. Tradition and Discovery 36 (1):21-37.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-04-29

Total downloads

9 ( #155,519 of 1,098,615 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #285,544 of 1,098,615 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.