Localization and the new phrenology: A review essay on William Uttal's the new phrenology [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 17 (1):107-123 (2004)
William Uttal's The new phrenology is a broad attack on localization in cognitive neuroscience. He argues that even though the brain is a highly differentiated organ, "high level cognitive functions" should not be localized in specific brain regions. First, he argues that psychological processes are not well-defined. Second, he criticizes the methods used to localize psychological processes, including imaging technology: he argues that variation among individuals compromises localization, and that the statistical methods used to construct activation maps are flawed. Neither criticism is compelling. First, as we illustrate, there are behavioral measures which offer at least weak constraints on psychological attribution. Second, though imaging does face methodological difficulties associated with variation among individuals, these are broadly acknowledged; moreover, his specific criticisms of the imaging work, and in particular of fMRI, misrepresent the methodology. In concluding, we suggest a way of framing the issues that might allow us to resolve differences between localizationist models and more distributed models empirically
|Keywords||Behavioral Sciences Imaging Localization Phrenology Science Uttal, W|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Colin Klein (2010). Philosophical Issues in Neuroimaging. Philosophy Compass 5 (2):186-198.
Similar books and articles
Robert E. Remez (1998). Listening to Speech in the Dark. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):281-282.
William R. Uttal (2003). Psychomythics: Sources of Artifacts and Misconceptions in Scientific Psychology. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Jennifer Mundale (2002). Concepts of Localization: Balkanization in the Brain. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 3 (3):313-30.
Steven Horst (2005). Modeling, Localization and the Explanation of Phenomenal Properties: Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences at the Beginning of the Millennium. Synthese 147 (3):477-513.
William R. Uttal (2002). Response to Bechtel and Lloyd. Brain and Mind 3 (1):261-273.
Malcolm J. Avison (2002). Functional Brain Mapping – What is It Good For? Absolutely Nothing? (Comments on the New Phrenology, by William R. Uttal). Brain and Mind 3 (3):367-373.
William R. Uttal (2002). Précis of the New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 3 (2):221-228.
William R. Uttal (2001). The New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain. MIT Press.
Dan Lloyd (2002). Studying the Mind From the Inside Out. Brain and Mind 3 (1):243-59.
William P. Bechtel (2002). Decomposing the Brain: A Long Term Pursuit. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 3 (1):229-242.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads62 ( #24,844 of 1,102,845 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,475 of 1,102,845 )
How can I increase my downloads?