On the relationship between cognitive models and spiritual maps. Evidence from Hebrew language mysticism

Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (11-12):11-12 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is suggested that the impetus to generate models is probably the most fundamental point of connection between mysticism and psychology. In their concern with the relation between ‘unseen’ realms and the ‘seen’, mystical maps parallel cognitive models of the relation between ‘unconscious’ and ‘conscious’ processes. The map or model constitutes an explanation employing terms current within the respective canon. The case of language mysticism is examined to illustrate the premise that cognitive models may benefit from an understanding of the kinds of experiences gained, and explanatory concepts advanced, within mystical traditions. Language mysticism is of particular interest on account of the central role thought to be played by language in relation to self and the individual's construction of reality. The discussion focuses on traditions of language mysticism within Judaism, in which emphasis is placed on the deconstruction of language into primary elements and the overarching significance of the divine Name. Analysis of the detailed techniques used suggests ways in which multiple associations to any given word/concept were consciously explored in an altered state. It appears that these mystics were consciously engaging with what are normally preconscious cognitive processes, whereby schematic associations to sensory images or thoughts are activated. The testimony from their writings implies that these mystics experienced distortions of the sense of self , which may suggest that, in the normal state, ‘I’ is constructed in relation to the preconscious system of associations. Moreover, an important feature of Hebrew language mysticism is its emphasis on embodiment -- specific associations were deemed to exist between the letters and each structure of the body. Implications, first, for the relationship between language and self, and, second, for the role of embodiment in relation to self are discussed. The importance of the continual emphasis on the Name of God throughout the linguistic practices may have provided a means for effectively replacing the cognitive indexing function hypothesized here to be normally played by ‘I’ with a more transpersonal cognitive index, especially in relation to memory

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cognitive models and spiritual maps.Jensine Andresen & Robert Kc Forman - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies. Controversies in Science and the Humanities, Special Edition 7 (11-12):4-287.
Horizontal models: From bakers to cats.Alisa Bokulich - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (3):609-627.
Hebrew language and Jewish thought.David Patterson - 2005 - New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
Cognitive maps and the language of thought.Michael Rescorla - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):377-407.
Divine therapy: love, mysticism, and psychoanalysis.Janet Sayers - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Mysticism, the spiritual path.Levi Raj Puri - 1964 - Beas, India,: Radha Soami Satsang.
Does evidence from ethology support bicoded cognitive maps?Shane Zappettini & Colin Allen - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (5):570-571.
How Theory of Mind and Executive Function Co-develop.Stephanie E. Miller & Stuart Marcovitch - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (4):597-625.
Fuzzy cognitive maps and neutrosophic cognitive maps.Vasantha Kandasamy & B. W. - 2003 - Phoenix: Xiquan. Edited by Florentin Smarandache.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-14

Downloads
756 (#18,891)

6 months
88 (#42,094)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian Les Lancaster
Liverpool John Moores University

Citations of this work

Collective Conscious Experience Across Time.Axel A. Randrup - 2002 - Anthropology of Consciousness 13 (1):27-41.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On a confusion about a function of consciousness.Ned Block - 1995 - Brain and Behavioral Sciences 18 (2):227-–247.
Consciousness Explained.Daniel C. Dennett - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):905-910.
Kinds of Minds.Daniel C. Dennett - 1996 - Basic Books.
The Varieties of Religious Experience.William James - 1903 - Philosophical Review 12 (1):62-67.

View all 34 references / Add more references