David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2004)
Philosophy as Fiction seeks to account for the peculiar power of philosophical literature by taking as its case study the paradigmatic generic hybrid of the twentieth century, Marcel Proust's In Search of Lost Time. At once philosophical--in that it presents claims, and even deploys arguments concerning such traditionally philosophical issues as knowledge, self-deception, selfhood, love, friendship, and art--and literary, in that its situations are imaginary and its stylization inescapably prominent, Proust's novel presents us with a conundrum. How should it be read? Can the two discursive structures co-exist, or must philosophy inevitably undermine literature (by sapping the narrative of its vitality) and literature undermine philosophy (by placing its claims in the mouth of an often unreliable narrator)? In the case of Proust at least, the result is greater than the sum of its parts. Not only can a coherent, distinctive philosophical system be extracted from the Recherche, once the narrator's periodic waywardness is taken into account; not only does a powerfully original style pervade its every nook, overtly reinforcing some theories and covertly exemplifying others; but aspects of the philosophy also serve literary ends, contributing more to character than to conceptual framework. What is more, aspects of the aesthetics serve philosophical ends, enabling a reader to engage in an active manner with an alternative art of living. Unlike the "essay" Proust might have written, his novel grants us the opportunity to use it as a practice ground for cooperation among our faculties, for the careful sifting of memories, for the complex procedures involved in self-fashioning, and for the related art of self-deception. It is only because the narrator's insights do not always add up--a weakness, so long as one treats the novel as a straightforward treatise--that it can produce its training effect, a feature that turns out to be its ultimate strength.
|Keywords||Self in literature Deception in literature Knowledge, Theory of, in literature|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$20.64 used (29% off) $21.83 new (25% off) $26.68 direct from Amazon (8% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||PQ2631.R63.Z6577 2004|
|ISBN(s)||0195169395 9780195169393 0195389352 9780195389357|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
R. Lanier Anderson (2005). Nietzsche on Truth, Illusion, and Redemption. European Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):185–225.
Similar books and articles
Ronald Bogue (2003). Deleuze on Literature. Routledge.
Jordi Fernández (2013). Self-Deception and Self-Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 162 (2):379-400.
Rita Felski (2008). Uses of Literature. Blackwell Pub..
Alfred R. Mele (1999). Twisted Self-Deception. Philosophical Psychology 12 (2):117-137.
Julia Peters (2010). Proust's Recherche and Hegelian Teleology. Inquiry 53 (2):146 – 161.
Vincent Descombes (1992). Proust: Philosophy of the Novel. Stanford University Press.
Rosa Slegers (2010). Courageous Vulnerability: Ethics and Knowledge in Proust, Bergson, Marcel, and James. Brill.
Gary Kemp (2005). Philosophy as Fiction: Self, Deception, and Knowledge in Proust (Review). Philosophy and Literature 29 (2):498-500.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads267 ( #8,061 of 1,792,063 )
Recent downloads (6 months)98 ( #4,956 of 1,792,063 )
How can I increase my downloads?