Graduate studies at Western
Phronesis 50 (2):150-169 (2005)
|Abstract||Proclus composed 18 arguments for the eternity of the world and they survive only because Philoponus, intending to refute Proclus' arguments one by one, quotes each; one copy of Philoponus' work -- and so Proclus' arguments too -- survives. Because of their odd history, these arguments have received little attention either in themselves or in relation to Proclus' other works, even though they are intrinsically interesting and reflect his larger philosophical enterprise. I first examine Argument XVIII, in which Proclus calls on "perpetuity", "eternity", and "time" to argue that the cosmos must be eternal. This argument leaves unanswered two important questions. The cosmos is caused by god and is itself a god; how can a cause and its effect both be gods? Proclus concludes that the cosmos is "a copy of the perpetuity of the eternal"; but what does this phrase -- and the conclusion that it expresses -- mean? To answer these questions, I turn to "The Elements of Theology," a systematic progression of 211 propositions disclosing the causal structure of all reality. "Eternity" and "time", along with "being perpetual", also appear here, particularly in propositions 40-55, to which I turn in the second part of this paper. They are conjoined with what Proclus calls "the Self-Constituted". I argue that by understanding the relation of the Self-Constituted as a cause to its effect, what depends upon another, we can also understand the causal relation between god and the cosmos. The cosmos can be called divine because, via the cause/effect relation between them, god and the cosmos are both eternal; the cosmos is "a copy of the perpetuity of the eternal" because via its relation to god, the cosmos becomes what its cause is, and in this precise sense an effect "imitates" its cause|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Helen S. Lang (2005). Perpetuity, Eternity, and Time in Proclus' Cosmos. Phronesis 50 (2):150 - 169.
Dirk Baltzly (2009). Gaia Gets to Know Herself : Proclus on the Self-Perception of the Cosmos. Phronesis 54:261-85.
Dirk Baltzly (2009). Gaia Gets to Know Herself: Proclus on the World's Self-Perception. Phronesis 54 (3):261-285.
Proclus (2008). On the Causes of the Cosmos (27c-29d). In , Proclus: Commentary on Plato's Timaeus. Cambridge University Press.
R. T. Mullins (2011). Divine Perfection and Creation. Heythrop Journal 54 (5).
Dirk Baltzly (2009). Proclus: Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Part IV – Proclus on the World Soul. A Translation with Notes and Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
John Philoponus (2004). Against Proclus' "on the Eternity of the World, 1-. Cornell University Press.
John Philoponus (2005). Against Proclus's "on the Eternity of the World, 6-8". Cornell University Press.
John Philoponus (2006). Against Proclus's "on the Eternity of the World, 12-18". Cornell University Press.
Gloria L. Schaab (2012). Trinity in Relation: Creation, Incarnation, and Grace in an Evolving Cosmos. Anselm Academic.
Michael Share (2008). On the Creation of the Cosmos (29e-31b). In Proclus (ed.), Proclus: Commentary on Plato's Timaeus. Cambridge University Press.
W. O'Neill (1962). Time and Eternity in Proclus. Phronesis 7 (2):161 - 165.
W. O'Neill (1962). Time and Eternity in Proclus. Phronesis 7 (1):161-165.
James Wilberding (2006). Philoponus. Against Proclus on the Eternity of the World (Books 12-18). Duckworth.
Delmas Lewis (1988). Eternity, Time and Timelessness. Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):72-86.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads3 ( #214,630 of 751,156 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #62,995 of 751,156 )
How can I increase my downloads?