Swinburne on the Simplicity of Theism
European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):409 - 426 (2011)
|Abstract||This paper argues that (1) Richard Swinburne’s general account of the simplicity of empirical hypotheses fails because it involves a deeply problematic notion of postulating a property, while there is a wide range of hypotheses where the assessment of simplicity rests entirely on the number and kinds of postulated properties, (2) Swinburne’s main argument in ’The Christian God’ for the simplicity of theism, the one based on considerations about pure limitless intentional power, is significantly weaker than he seems to believe. The paper does not draw a conclusion about whether theism is simple|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jeremy Gwiazda (2009). Richard Swinburne's Argument to the Simplicity of God Via the Infinite. Religious Studies 45 (4):487-493.
Richard Swinburne (1999). Many Kinds of Rational Theistic Belief. In G. Bruntrup & R. K. Tacelli (eds.), The Rationality of Theism. Kluwer.
Don Fawkes & Tom Smythe (1996). Simplicity and Theology. Religious Studies 32 (2):259 - 270.
Nicola Mößner & Markus Seidel (2008). Is the Principle of Testimony Simply Epistemically Fundamental or Simply Not? Swinburne on Knowledge by Testimony. In Nicola Mößner, Sebastian Schmoranzer & Christian Weidemann (eds.), Richard Swinburne. Christian Philosophy in a Modern World. Ontos.
Jeremy Gwiazda (2009). Richard Swinburne, 'The Existence of God'. Sophia 48 (4):393 - 398.
Richard Swinburne (2000). Cosmological and Teleological Arguments. In The Rationality of Theism. Rodopi.
Quentin Smith (1992). The Anthropic Coincidences, Evil and the Disconfirmation of Theism. Religious Studies 28 (3):347 - 350.
Richard Swinburne (2006). Sobel on Arguments From Design. Philosophia Christi 8 (2):227 - 234.
Richard Swinburne (2004). The Existence of God. Oxford University Press.
Richard Swinburne (2009). How the Divine Properties Fit Together: Reply to Gwiazda. Religious Studies 45 (4):495-498.
William Hasker (2002). Is Christianity Probable? Swinburne's Apologetic Programme. Religious Studies 38 (3):253-264.
Peter Forrest (2007). Developmental Theism: From Pure Will to Unbounded Love. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-06-02
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?