Three-dimensionalism and counterpart theory
Analysis 65 (288):321–325 (2005)
| Abstract | Jim Stone argues that one cannot combine three-dimensionalism with counterpart theory. This paper argues to the contrary. | |||||||||
| Keywords | three dimensionalism counterpart theory Jim Stone | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTheodore Sider (2001). Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford University Press.
Todd Buras (2006). Counterpart Theory, Natural Properties, and Essentialism. Journal of Philosophy 103 (1):27-42.
Jim Stone (2009). Why Counterpart Theory and Modal Realism Are Incompatible. Analysis 69 (4):650-653.
Enrique Romerales (2007). Persistence, Ontic Vagueness and Identity: Towards a Substantialist Four–Dimensionalism. Metaphysica 9 (1):33-55.
Jim Stone (2010). Counterpart Theory V. The Multiverse: Reply to Watson. Analysis 71 (1):96-100.
Jim Stone (2007). Counterpart Theory and Four-Dimensionalism: A Reply to Eagle. Analysis 67 (295):263–267.
Jim Stone (2005). Why Counterpart Theory and Three-Dimensionalism Are Incompatible. Analysis 65 (Jan):24-27.
Jim Stone (2005). Why Counterpart Theory and Four-Dimensionalism Are Incompatible. Analysis 65 (288):329–333.
Jim Stone (2005). Counterpart Theory and Three-Dimensionalism: A Reply. Analysis 65 (288):325–329.
Antony Eagle (2007). Reply to Stone on Counterpart Theory and Four-Dimensionalism. Analysis 67 (2):159-162.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads29 ( #42,452 of 549,510 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,510 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
