David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 38 (2):221-223 (1971)
The Bohr-Heisenberg doctrine of wave-particle duality has been attacked in the past for its methodical defects, over-complication, internal contradictions, its positivistic phenomenalism, etc. The present investigation shows that duality, the doctrine of equivalence of the particle picture and the wave picture of matter, is untenable since its wave part leads to empirically wrong results in the relativistic domain, and violates the postulate of independence of the arbitrary choice of reference system in the non-relativistic realm. Therefore, when methodical objections were never quite conclusive, the physical failure of the duality idea seals its fate irrefutably, together with all its pseudo-philosophical implications
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John J. Fleming (1964). Sub-Quantum Entities. Philosophy of Science 31 (3):271-274.
Nicholas Maxwell (2004). Does Probabilism Solve the Great Quantum Mystery? Theoria 19 (3):321-336.
Alfred Landé (1962). The Case Against Quantum Duality. Philosophy of Science 29 (1):1-6.
Kristian Camilleri (2006). Heisenberg and the Wave–Particle Duality. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (2):298-315.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #52,451 of 1,099,914 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #13,444 of 1,099,914 )
How can I increase my downloads?