The persistence of counterexample: Re-examining the debate over Leibniz law
Noûs 25 (1):43-61 (1991)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRoger Stuart Berkowitz (2005/2010). The Gift of Science: Leibniz and the Modern Legal Tradition. Harvard University Press.
Tobias Hansson Wahlberg (2008). Can I Be an Instantaneous Stage and yet Persist Through Time? Metaphysica 9 (2):235-239.
Dale Jacquette (2011). Modal Objection to Naive Leibnizian Identity. History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (2):107 - 118.
Jan-Erik Jones (2006). Leibniz and Locke and the Debate Over Species. In François Duchesneau & Jérémie Girard (eds.), Leibniz selon les Nouxeaux Essais sur l'entendement Humain. Vrin and Bellarmin.
Benjamin Schnieder (2006). 'By Leibniz's Law': Remarks on a Fallacy. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):39-54.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1972). Leibniz. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
By Benjamin Schnieder (2006). 'By Leibniz's Law': Remarks on a Fallacy. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):39–54.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1976). Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Neil Feit (1996). On a Famous Counterexample to Leibniz's Law. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96:381 - 386.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads16 ( #74,716 of 549,128 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
