The significance of anaphoric theories of truth and reference
Philosophical Issues 8:181-198 (1997)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesEmma Borg (2004). Review: Terms and Truth: Reference Direct and Anaphoric. [REVIEW] Mind 113 (452):737-740.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen & J. P. Smit (2010). Anaphora and Semantic Innocence. Journal of Semantics 27 (1).
S. Predelli (2004). Terms and Truth, Reference Direct and Anaphoric. Philosophical Review 113 (3):432-434.
Ben Caplan (2004). Terms and Truth: Reference Direct and Anaphoric. Dialogue 43 (3):617-619.
Arvid Båve (2009). A Deflationary Theory of Reference. Synthese 169 (1):51 - 73.
Fred Kroon (2004). Terms and Truth: Reference Direct and Anaphoric. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (2):353 – 356.
Michael P. Wolf (2006). Rigid Designation and Anaphoric Theories of Reference. Philosophical Studies 130 (2):351 - 375.
J. P. Smit & A. Steglich-Petersen (2010). Anaphora and Semantic Innocence. Journal of Semantics 27 (1):119-124.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads11 ( #99,430 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
