Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change

Cambridge University Press (2004)
Joseph LaPorte argues that scientists have not discovered that sentences about natural kinds are true rather than false. Instead, scientists have found that these sentences were vaguely phrased in the language of earlier speakers and they have thus refined the meanings of the terms to validate the sentences. In the process, however, they have also changed the meaning of the terms. This book will appeal to students and professionals in the philosophy of science, the philosophy of biology and the philosophy of language.
Keywords Biology Philosophy  Essentialism (Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book $61.98 used (42% off)   $90.25 new (15% off)   $100.70 direct from Amazon (5% off)    Amazon page
Call number QH331.L29 2004
ISBN(s) 9780521825993
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Muhammad Ali Khalidi (2009). How Scientific is Scientific Essentialism? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40 (1):85 - 101.
    Jussi Haukioja (2012). Rigidity and Actuality-Dependence. Philosophical Studies 157 (3):399-410.

    View all 24 citations

    Similar books and articles

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    52 ( #25,845 of 1,089,047 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    3 ( #30,948 of 1,089,047 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.