A puzzle about the significance of skepticism
| Abstract | II. Introduction A. The following claims are individually plausible: 1. Skepticism is philosophically significant. 2. Skepticism is philosophically significant only if there is some skeptical argument that is bound to reveal something about either the scope or.. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesStephen Maitzen (2006). The Impossibility of Local Skepticism. Philosophia 34 (4):453-464.
Bruce Russell (2005). Contextualism on a Pragmatic, Not a Skeptical, Footing. Acta Analytica 20 (2):26-37.
William S. Larkin (2000). Content Skepticism. Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (1):33-43.
Joshua Seigal (2010). Skeptical Theism, Moral Skepticism, and Divine Deception. Forum Philosophicum 15 (2):251-274.
Christine M. Korsgaard (1986). Skepticism About Practical Reason. Journal of Philosophy 83 (1):5-25.
John Greco (ed.) (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press.
Paul Kurtz (2010). Exuberant Skepticism. Prometheus Books 59 John Glenn Drive.
Linton Wang & Oliver Tai (2010). Skeptical Conclusions. Erkenntnis 72 (2):177 - 204.
Wai-Hung Wong (2011). What the Skeptic Still Can't Learn From How We Use the Word 'Know'. In J. Bridges, N. Kolodny & W. Wong (eds.), The Possibility of Philosophical Understanding: Reflections on the Thought of Barry Stroud. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #83,078 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,703 of 549,065 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
