David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (2):231-258 (2002)
Examining the literature on Aristotelian psychology can leave one with the impression that his theory of perception and emotion is credible primarily because it accords with contemporary functionalism, a physicalist theory that has achieved orthodoxy in contemporary philosophy of mind. In my view, squeezing Aristotle into a functionalist mold is a mistake, for functionalism entaiIs at least two theses that Aristotle would reject: (1) that material types make no essential difference to perception and emotion (and to mental states in general), and (2) that mental states are reducible to functional states of matter (a reductionism of the token-specific sort). Against these functionalist theses, Aristotle would include within his analysis of human perception and emotion (and other psychological activities) the biological material and the characteristic operations associated with it. Although Aristotle would insist that this biological material makes an essential difference to conscious experience, conscious experience is not reducible to its biological basis. I defend the positions that Aristotle’s philosophy of perception and emotion is not compatible with contemporary functionalism and that conscious experience of perception and emotion is irreducible to its essential biological basis
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
L. S. Carrier (2006). Aristotelian Materialism. Philosophia 34 (3):253-266.
Mikko Salmela (2011). Can Emotion Be Modelled on Perception? Dialectica 65 (1):1-29.
Robert C. Solomon (ed.) (2004). Thinking About Feeling: Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions. Oxford University Press.
Dennis E. Skocz (2007). Aristotle and Heidegger on the “Worldliness” of Emotion: A Hermeneutical Auseinandersetzung. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):157-168.
Christopher D. Green (1998). The Thoroughly Modern Aristotle: Was He Really a Functionalist? [Journal (on-Line/Unpaginated)].
Michela Balconi & Claudio Lucchiari (2005). Consciousness, Emotion and Face: An Event-Related Potentials (ERP) Study. In Ralph D. Ellis & Natika Newton (eds.), Consciousness & Emotion: Agency, Conscious Choice, and Selective Perception. John Benjamins 121.
Stephen Everson (1996). Aristotle on Perception. Oxford University Press.
Richard McDonough (2000). Aristotle's Critique of Functionalist Theories of Mind. Idealistic Studies 30 (3):209-232.
Uriah Kriegel (2012). Towards a New Feeling Theory of Emotion. European Journal of Philosophy (3):420-442.
Nico H. Frijda (2009). Emotion Experience and its Varieties. Emotion Review 1 (3):264-271.
Malcolm Budd (2012). The Musical Expression of Emotion: Metaphorical-As Versus Imaginative-As Perception. Estetika 49 (2):131-147.
Kristján Kristjánsson (2008). Expendable Emotions. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):5-22.
Lisa Feldman Barrett (2005). Feeling is Perceiving: Core Affect and Conceptualization in the Experience of Emotion. In Lisa Feldman Barrett, Paula M. Niedenthal & Piotr Winkielman (eds.), Emotion and Consciousness. Guilford Press 255-284.
P. Nieuwenburg (2002). Emotion and Perception in Aristotle's Rhetoric. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (1):86 – 100.
J. A. Towey (1999). Aristotle on the Sense Organs (Review). [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 119:192-193.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads20 ( #194,732 of 1,911,814 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,984 of 1,911,814 )
How can I increase my downloads?