Against the Functionalist Reading of Aristotle's Philosophy of Perception and Emotion
International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (2):231-258 (2002)
| Abstract | Examining the literature on Aristotelian psychology can leave one with the impression that his theory of perception and emotion is credible primarily because it accords with contemporary functionalism, a physicalist theory that has achieved orthodoxy in contemporary philosophy of mind. In my view, squeezing Aristotle into a functionalist mold is a mistake, for functionalism entaiIs at least two theses that Aristotle would reject: (1) that material types make no essential difference to perception and emotion (and to mental states in general), and (2) that mental states are reducible to functional states of matter (a reductionism of the token-specific sort). Against these functionalist theses, Aristotle would include within his analysis of human perception and emotion (and other psychological activities) the biological material and the characteristic operations associated with it. Although Aristotle would insist that this biological material makes an essential difference to conscious experience, conscious experience is not reducible to its biological basis. I defend the positions that Aristotle’s philosophy of perception and emotion is not compatible with contemporary functionalism and that conscious experience of perception and emotion is irreducible to its essential biological basis | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesL. S. Carrier (2006). Aristotelian Materialism. Philosophia 34 (3):253-266.
Mikko Salmela (2011). Can Emotion Be Modelled on Perception? Dialectica 65 (1):1-29.
Robert C. Solomon (ed.) (2004). Thinking About Feeling: Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions. Oxford University Press.
Dennis E. Skocz (2007). Aristotle and Heidegger on the “Worldliness” of Emotion: A Hermeneutical Auseinandersetzung. Epoché 12 (1):157-168.
Christopher D. Green (1998). The Thoroughly Modern Aristotle: Was He Really a Functionalist? [Journal (on-Line/Unpaginated)].
Michela Balconi & Claudio Lucchiari (2005). Consciousness, Emotion and Face: An Event-Related Potentials (ERP) Study. In Ralph D. Ellis & Natika Newton (eds.), Consciousness & Emotion: Agency, Conscious Choice, and Selective Perception. John Benjamins.
Stephen Everson (1997). Aristotle on Perception. Oxford University Press.
Richard McDonough (2000). Aristotle's Critique of Functionalist Theories of Mind. Idealistic Studies 30 (3):209-232.
Uriah Kriegel (2012). Towards a New Feeling Theory of Emotion. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1).
Nico H. Frijda (2009). Emotion Experience and its Varieties. Emotion Review 1 (3):264-271.
Malcolm Budd (2012). The Musical Expression of Emotion: Metaphorical-As Versus Imaginative-As Perception. Estetika 49 (2):131-147.
Kristján Kristjánsson (2008). Expendable Emotions. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):5-22.
Lisa Feldman Barrett (2005). Feeling is Perceiving: Core Affect and Conceptualization in the Experience of Emotion. In Lisa Feldman Barrett, Paula M. Niedenthal & Piotr Winkielman (eds.), Emotion and Consciousness.
P. Nieuwenburg (2002). Emotion and Perception in Aristotle's Rhetoric. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (1):86 – 100.
J. A. Towey (1999). Aristotle on the Sense Organs (Review). [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 119:192-193.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads10 ( #106,238 of 549,070 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,070 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
