David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):169-184 (2007)
In this essay, I investigate our understanding of what counts as philosophical. Using the life and work of Wittgenstein as a test case, I take a close look at how various Wittgenstein scholars relate to work other than the principal and accepted philosophical texts (such as the Tractatus and the Philosophical Investigations), and suggest that there is an inconsistency in the criteria of what we can and should be taking seriously for philosophical purposes; sometimes there is inconsistency of use (one thing is said, another is done), and sometimes there is inconsistency in the form of occlusion (the scholar simply avoids the chance (or responsibility) to define terms). Guarding against advocacy for essentialism, I argue that philosophers might benefit from a more direct and explicit engagement with the criteria they use when writing about the philosophical significance of material other than dominant texts. That engagement, however, reveals that the pursuit of criteria is at odds with the spirit of Wittgenstein’s philosophy. As a result, we stand in need of an alternative method of discerning what counts. I suggestthat, in the context of Wittgenstein’s work, such a method is a matter of approach, not criteria. Perhaps this method can extend beyond Wittgenstein’s work to a general view of what counts as philosophical
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
E. D. Klemke (1971). Essays on Wittgenstein. Urbana,University of Illinois Press.
David G. Stern (2000). The Significance of Jewishness for Wittgenstein's Philosophy. Inquiry 43 (4):383 – 401.
Marie McGinn (1997). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Wittgenstein and the Philosophical Investigations. Routledge.
Peter C. Kjaergaard (2002). Hertz and Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):121-149.
Béla Szabados (1997). Wittgenstein's Women. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:483-508.
Chrysoula Gitsoulis (2007). The Moral Dimension of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Method. Analysis and Metaphysics (Special Issue on Wittgenstein) 6:452-467.
David G. Stern (1994). Recent Work on Wittgenstein, 1980–1990. [REVIEW] Synthese 98 (3):415-458.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #337,070 of 1,907,626 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,516 of 1,907,626 )
How can I increase my downloads?