Lakatos as historian of mathematics

Philosophia Mathematica 5 (1):42-64 (1997)
Abstract
This paper discusses the connection between the actual history of mathematics and Lakatos's philosophy of mathematics, in three parts. The first points to studies by Lakatos and others which support his conception of mathematics and its history. In the second I suggest that the apparent poverty of Lakatosian examples may be due to the way in which the history of mathematics is usually written. The third part argues that Lakatos is right to hold philosophy accountable to history, even if Lakatos's own view of mathematics fails that test.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,978
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Eduard Glas (2001). The 'Popperian Programme' and Mathematics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (1):119-137.
E. Glas (1999). Thought-Experimentation and Mathematical Innovation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1):1-19.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

17 ( #97,082 of 1,100,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #58,761 of 1,100,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.