David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 37 (4):421-435 (1994)
W. V. Quine has made statements about truth which are not obviously compatible, and his statements have been interpreted in more than one way. For example, Donald Davidson claims that Quine has an epistemic theory of truth, but Quine himself often says that truth is just disquotational. This paper argues that Quine should recognize two different notions of truth. One of these is disquotational, the other is empiricist. There is nothing wrong with recognizing two different notions of truth. Both may be perfectly legitimate, even though, to some extent, they may be applicable in different contexts. Roughly speaking, a sentence is true in the empiricist sense if it belongs to a theory which entails all observation sentences which would be assented to by the speakers of the language in question (and no observation sentences which would be dissented from by these speakers). Various objections to this idea are discussed and rejected
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
W. V. Quine, Robert B. Barrett & Roger F. Gibson (eds.) (1990). Perspectives on Quine. B. Blackwell.
Hilary Putnam (1985). Why Reason Can't Be Naturalized. In Synthese. Cambridge University Press 3-24.
Hilary Putnam (1982). Why Reason Can't Be Naturalized. Synthese 52 (1):229--47.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Wybo Houkes (2002). Normativity in Quine's Naturalism: The Technology of Truth-Seeking? [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (2):251-267.
Donald Davidson (1994). What is Quine's View of Truth? Inquiry 37 (4):437 – 440.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1990). Quine's Relativism. Ratio 3 (2):142-149.
Marian David (1996). Analyticity, Carnap, Quine, and Truth. Philosophical Perspectives 10:281 - 296.
G. Ebbs (2011). Carnap and Quine on Truth by Convention. Mind 120 (478):193-237.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1993). The Disquotational Theory of Truth is False. Philosophia 22 (3-4):331-339.
Richard Creath (1998). Quine and the Limit Assumption in Peirce's Theory of Truth. Philosophical Studies 90 (2):109-112.
Folke Tersman (2008). Quine on Ethics. Theoria 64 (1):84-98.
Charles Sayward (2007). Quine and His Critics on Truth-Functionality and Extensionality. Logic and Logical Philosophy 16 (1):45-63.
Lars Bergström (1994). Quine's Truth. Inquiry 37 (4):421 – 435.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads16 ( #236,202 of 1,911,519 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,720 of 1,911,519 )
How can I increase my downloads?