Agreement and disputes in dialogue
| Abstract | In this paper we define agreement in terms of shared public commitments, and implicit agreement is conditioned on the semantics of the relational speech acts (e.g., Narration, Explanation) that each agent performs. We provide a consistent interpretation of disputes, and updating a logical form with the current utterance always involves extending it and not revising it, even if the current utterance denies earlier content. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesMiguel Ruiz (2010). The Fifth Agreement: A Practical Guide to Self-Mastery. Distributed by Hay House.
Peter D. Sozou, Sally Sheldon & Geraldine M. Hartshorne (2010). Consent Agreements for Cryopreserved Embryos: The Case for Choice. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (4):230-233.
George Rudebusch (1986). Hoffman on Kripke's Wittgenstein. Philosophical Research Archives 12:177-182.
Kent Bach (1995). Terms of Agreement. Ethics 105 (3):604-612.
R. M. (2004). Understanding Acts of Consent: Using Speech Act Theory to Help Resolve Moral Dilemmas and Legal Disputes. Law and Philosophy 23 (5):495-525.
Martin Gunderson (1979). Threats and Coercion. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):247 - 259.
A. Lascarides & N. Asher (2009). Agreement, Disputes and Commitments in Dialogue. Journal of Semantics 26 (2):109-158.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #203,740 of 556,772 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
