Context, relevant parts and (lack of) disagreement over taste [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 156 (3):433-439 (2011)
Responds to an argument against relativist semantics advanced in Cappelen and Hawthorne’s Relativism and Monadic Truth.
Keywords philpapers: relativism about truth
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-010-9625-x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,707
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
John MacFarlane (2007). Relativism and Disagreement. Philosophical Studies 132 (1):17-31.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
John Collins (2013). The Syntax of Personal Taste. Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1):51-103.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Karl Schafer (2011). Faultless Disagreement and Aesthetic Realism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):265-286.
Scott Soames (2011). True At. [REVIEW] Analysis 71 (1):124 - 133.
John K. Davis (2010). An Alternative to Relativism. Philosophical Topics 38 (2):17-37.
Stefano Predelli & Isidora Stojanovic (2008). Semantic Relativism and the Logic of Indexicals. In Manuel García-Carpintero & Max Kölbel (eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford University Press 63--90.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

108 ( #27,710 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #66,646 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.