Emilie du Châtelet on the Existence and Nature of God: An Examination of Her Arguments in Light of Their Sources
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (4):741 - 758 (2011)
| Abstract | Many commentators have suggested that the metaphysical portions of Emilie du Châtelet's Institutions de physique are a mere retelling of Leibniz's views. I argue that a close reading of the text shows that du Châtelet's cosmological argument and discussion of God's nature contains both Lockean and Leibnizian elements. I discuss where she follows Locke in her arguments, what Leibnizian elements she brings in, and how this enables her to avoid some of the mistakes commonly attributed to Locke's formulation of the cosmological argument. I show that while du Châtelet accepts the causal principle ex nihilo nihil fit, she does not utilize Locke's stronger causal principle. I also discuss her use of the principle of sufficient reason in both improving the Lockean cosmological argument and in proving the attributes of God | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSeyed Hassan Hosseini (2011). A Comparative Study on the Degree of Dependence of Clarke's and Sadra's Arguments for the Existence of God on the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Hekmat Va Falsafeh 6 (24):53 - 68.
W. Jay Wood (2011). God. Mcgill-Queen’s Univ Pr.
Sarah Hutton (2004). Emilie du Châtelet's Institutions de Physique as a Document in the History of French Newtonianism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (3):515-531.
Christopher Weaver (2009). Explanation, Entailment, and Leibnizian Cosmological Arguments. Metaphysica 10 (1):97-108.
Brian Leftow (2003). On a Principle of Sufficient Reason. Religious Studies 39 (3):269-286.
Charles E. Gutenson (1997). What Swinburne Should Have Concluded. Religious Studies 33 (3):243-247.
Mogens Laerke (2011). Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God. Archiv Fuer Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58 - 84.
Patrick Frierson (2011). Rational Faith: God, Immortality, Grace. In Immanuel Kant: Key Concepts. Acumen Publishing Limited.
Ismail Latif Hacinebioglu (2008). Does God Exist? Logical Foundations of the Cosmological Argument. Insan Publ.
Richard M. Gale (1991). On the Nature and Existence of God. Cambridge University Press.
Gilles Châtelet (2006). Interlacing the Singularity, the Diagram and the Metaphor. Translated by Simon B. Duffy. In Simon B. Duffy (ed.), Virtual Mathematics: the logic of difference. Clinamen.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-07-29Total downloads15 ( #78,702 of 549,120 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,120 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
