David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
World Futures 58 (2 & 3):137 – 147 (2002)
As we enter the 21st century and the new millennium, our collective evolution reaches a critical threshold. We cannot go on as we did before: our world has become unsustainable. Sooner or later many local ecosystems would collapse, the climate would change adversely for agriculture and habitation, species incompatible with a large and dense human population would profilerate, and resources critical for human health and survival would become scarce, or at least beyond the reach of a critical segment of humanity. We need to shift gears, moving from the kind of evolution that characterized our scientific-technological civilization, to the kind that is compatible with the human condition as it evolves on this planet. This shift requires a corresponding shift in our concept of the world. The dominant mechanistic and atomistic paradigm no longer serves us: it is not only factually incorrect in view of the latest discoveries of the sciences, it also inspires dangerously misguided behaviors. We need to find a deeper and better view of the human condition. We must no longer just see the trees: we must also see the forest. That is, we must learn to see the planetary socio-ecosystem with all its subsystems, diversities, and also its actual and potential unities. What we need is a holistic view, a view of the human being as part of her or his community, which is part of its local environment, which is part of its society and culture, which is part of the system of cultures and societies in the human family-which is part of the global environment: of the biosphere.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Dieter Gernert (2004). Incomplete Knowledge and the Chances of a Constructive Mastering. World Futures 60 (8):547 – 565.
Similar books and articles
Ashok K. Gangadean (2006). The Awakening of Global Reason the Logical and Ontological Foundation of Integral Science. World Futures 62 (1 & 2):56 – 74.
Arthur Saniotis & Maciej Henneberg (2011). An Evolutionary Approach Toward Exploring Altered States of Consciousness, Mind–Body Techniques, and Non-Local Mind. World Futures 67 (3):182 - 200.
Rafal Serafin (1988). Noosphere, Gaia, and the Science of the Biosphere. Environmental Ethics 10 (2):121-137.
Elisabet Sahtouris (2006). Why True Globalization Depends on New Scientific Models. World Futures 62 (1 & 2):17 – 27.
Ashok K. Gangadean (2006). A Planetary Crisis of Consciousness: The End of Ego-Based Cultures and Our Dimensional Shift Toward a Sustainable Global Civilization. World Futures 62 (6):441 – 454.
David Lumsden (2002). Crossing the Symbolic Threshold: A Critical Review of Terrence Deacon's the Symbolic Species. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 15 (2):155 – 171.
Z. Naveh (2004). Multifunctional, Self-Organizing Biosphere Landscapes and the Future of Our Total Human Ecosystem. World Futures 60 (7):469 – 502.
Eric Cohen (2008). In the Shadow of Progress: Being Human in the Age of Technology. Encounter Books.
Michael Vincent McGinnis (1996). Deep Ecology and the Foundations of Restoration. Inquiry 39 (2):203 – 217.
David Christian (2008). Big History. Teaching Co..
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #163,931 of 1,790,292 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #106,127 of 1,790,292 )
How can I increase my downloads?