David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dialectica 62 (4):535-540 (2008)
McKinsey-style incompatibilist arguments attempt to show that the thesis that subjects have privileged, a priori access to the contents of their thoughts is incompatible with semantic externalism. This incompatibility follows – it is urged – from the fact that these theses jointly entail an absurd conclusion, namely, the possibility of a priori knowledge of the world. In a recent paper I argued that a large and important class of such arguments exemplifies a dialectical failure: if they are valid, the putatively absurd conclusion can be generated without the privileged access premise. Michael McKinsey has responded by arguing that the semantic externalist should adopt a neutral free logic invalidating a principle that my argument essentially relies on. I will say why the semantic commitments of the externalist are in tension with free logic, thereby vindicating my original argument.
|Keywords||privileged access self knowledge a priori knowledge externalism McKinsey semantic externalism free logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Harold W. Noonan (2000). McKinsey-Brown Survives. Analysis 60 (268):353-356.
Richard W. Miller (1997). Externalist Self-Knowledge and the Scope of the a Priori. Analysis 57 (1):67-74.
James Pryor (2007). What's Wrong with McKinsey-Style Reasoning? In Sanford Goldberg (ed.), Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. 177--200.
Ted Parent (2015). Self‐Knowledge and Externalism About Empty Concepts. Analytic Philosophy 55 (3).
Paul Noordhof (2004). Outsmarting the McKinsey-Brown Argument? Analysis 64 (1):48-56.
Michael McKinsey (2003). Transmission of Warrant and Closure of Apriority. In Susana Nuccetelli (ed.), New Essays on Semantic Externalism and Self-Knowledge. MIT Press. 97--116.
Michael McKinsey (2001). The Semantic Basis of Externalism. In J. Campbell, M.O. Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Meaning and Truth. New York: Seven Bridges Press.
Corine Besson (2009). Externalism, Internalism, and Logical Truth. Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):1-29.
Duncan Pritchard (2002). McKinsey Paradoxes, Radical Skepticism, and the Transmission of Knowledge Across Known Entailments. Synthese 130 (2):279-302.
Jussi Haukioja (2006). Semantic Externalism and A Priori Self-Knowledge. Ratio 19 (2):149-159.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #70,385 of 1,140,000 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #92,708 of 1,140,000 )
How can I increase my downloads?