David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):383-384 (1999)
Pylyshyn makes a convincing case that early visual processing is cognitively impenetrable, and although I question the utility of binary oppositions such as penetrable/impenetrable, for the most part I am in agreement. The author does not provide explicit designations or denotations for the terms penetrable and impenetrable, which appear quite arbitrary. Furthermore, the use of focal attention smacks of an homunculus, and the account appears to slip too easily between the perceptual, the cognitive, and the neurophysiological.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kieran Egan & Gillian Judson (2009). Values and Imagination in Teaching: With a Special Focus on Social Studies. Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (2):126-140.
Philippe G. Schyns (1999). The Case for Cognitive Penetrability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):394-395.
Edouard Gentaz & Yves Rossetti (1999). Is Haptic Perception Continuous with Cognition? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):378-379.
Brian McElree & Barbara Anne Dosher (2001). The Focus of Attention Across Space and Across Time. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):129-130.
Jack Reynolds (2002). Kirby, Merleau-Ponty, and the Question of an Embodied Deconstruction. Contretemps (3):133-47.
Andrew Metcalfe & Ann Game (2012). 'In the Beginning is Relation': Martin Buber's Alternative to Binary Oppositions. [REVIEW] Sophia 51 (3):351-363.
Boris Crassini, Jack Broerse, R. H. Day, Christopher J. Best & W. A. Sparrow (1999). What is the Point of Attempting to Make a Case for Cognitive Impenetrability of Visual Perception? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):372-373.
Matthew Ratcliffe (2010). Binary Oppositions in Psychiatry: For or Against? Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (3):233-239.
Su-Ling Yeh & I.-Ping Chen (1999). Is Early Visual Processing Attention Impenetrable? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):400-400.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #290,390 of 1,778,284 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,352 of 1,778,284 )
How can I increase my downloads?