David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
OUP Oxford (2005)
Reassembling the Social is a fundamental challenge from one of the world's leading social theorists to how we understand society and the 'social'. Bruno Latour's contention is that the word 'social', as used by Social Scientists, has become laden with assumptions to the point where it has become misnomer. When the adjective is applied to a phenomenon, it is used to indicate a stablilized state of affairs, a bundle of ties that in due course may be used to account for another phenomenon. But Latour also finds the word used as if it described a type of material, in a comparable way to an adjective such as 'wooden' or 'steely'. Rather than simply indicating what is already assembled together, it is now used in a way that makes assumptions about the nature of what is assembled. It has become a word that designates two distinct things: a process of assembling; and a type of material, distinct from others. Latour shows why 'the social' cannot be thought of as a kind of material or domain, and disputes attempts to provide a 'social explanations' of other states of affairs. While these attempts have been productive (and probably necessary) in the past, the very success of the social sciences mean that they are largely no longer so. At the present stage it is no longer possible to inspect the precise constituents entering the social domain. Latour returns to the original meaning of 'the social' to redefine the notion, and allow it to trace connections again. It will then be possible to resume the traditional goal of the social sciences, but using more refined tools. Drawing on his extensive work examining the 'assemblages' of nature, Latour finds it necessary to scrutinize thoroughly the exact content of what is assembled under the umbrella of Society. This approach, a 'sociology of associations', has become known as Actor-Network-Theory, and this book is an essential introduction both for those seeking to understand Actor-Network Theory, or the ideas of one of its most influential proponents.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$30.00 used (40% off) $74.60 new Amazon page|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Curtis Fogel (2010). Paul A. Boghossian, Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 20 (1):149-153.
Richard Edwards (2011). Translating the Prescribed Into the Enacted Curriculum in College and School. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (5-6):38-54.
Ugo Pagallo (2011). Robots of Just War: A Legal Perspective. Philosophy and Technology 24 (3):307-323.
Yoni van Den Eede (2011). In Between Us: On the Transparency and Opacity of Technological Mediation. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 16 (2):139-159.
Federica Timeto (2011). Diffracting the Rays of Technoscience: A Situated Critique of Representation. Poiesis and Praxis 8 (2-3):151-167.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas J. Rowland, Jan-Hendrik Passoth & Alexander B. Kinney (2011). Latour's Greatest Hits, Reassembled: Review of Bruno Latour's Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. [REVIEW] Spontaneous Generations 5 (1):95-99.
Gesa Lindemann (2011). On Latour's Social Theory and Theory of Society, and His Contribution to Saving the World. Human Studies 34 (1):93-110.
Steve Fuller (2000). Why Science Studies has Never Been Critical of Science: Some Recent Lessons on How to Be a Helpful Nuisance and a Harmless Radical. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (1):5-32.
Bruno Latour (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press.
Matthias Gross (2010). The Public Proceduralization of Contingency: Bruno Latour and the Formation of Collective Experiments. Social Epistemology 24 (1):63 – 74.
Paloma García Díaz (2008). Los límites del principio de indeterminación radical en Latour y el giro político de su filosofía de la ciencia. Theoria 23 (3):319-336.
Daniel Breslau (2000). Sociology After Humanism: A Lesson From Contemporary Science Studies. Sociological Theory 18 (2):289-307.
David M. Kaplan (2009). What Things Still Don't Do. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (2):229 - 240.
David M. Kaplan (2009). Review: What Things Still Don't Do. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (2):229 - 240.
Theodore R. Schatzki (1996). Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge University Press.
Jeff Kochan (2010). Latour's Heidegger. Social Studies of Science 40 (4):579-598.
Jeff Kochan (2006). Rescuing the Gorgias From Latour. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):395-422.
E. Seguin (2000). Bloor, Latour, and the Field. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (3):503-508.
Tom R. Burns (2006). The Sociology of Complex Systems: An Overview of Actor-System-Dynamics Theory. World Futures 62 (6):411 – 440.
Bruno Latour (1988). The Author Rebounds: Latour to Oldroyd. Social Epistemology 2 (2):183.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads29 ( #64,368 of 1,101,940 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #12,883 of 1,101,940 )
How can I increase my downloads?