Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 96 (1):63 - 77 (2010)
|Abstract||Most empirical studies of corporate social responsibility (CSR) focus on variables at the company level. In this article, I focus on the sector level: I consider features of the international clothing business and of the global economy in general, that may influence the CSR potential. There is high ‘CSR potential’ when sector-specific features indicate that the risk of violating CSR standards is high. Thus, ‘high CSR potential’ indicates that there is a potential for positive influence through CSR-related actions. Based on several empirical studies of the clothing business, I identify six features that indicate a high CSR potential. These features are shown to be consistent with more general features of the global economy. This holds whether we emphasize asymmetric relations and unequal distribution, the product cycle, or transnationalization. Thus, the CSR potential of the international clothing business seems not only to be a product of sector-specific properties, but also of more systemic and general features of the global economy. This suggests that the CSR performance of individual companies may enhance their social and environmental impact, but will probably have little effect on the features that determine the CSR potential. In order to affect these features I argue, we rely on other institutions to act – mainly governments. Finally, I conclude that this study shows that it is useful to identify the CSR potential of a business sector. We get a picture of which part of the international CSR standards companies run the greatest risk of violating and of which structural issues intergovernmental actions should address to reduce the potential for violating CSR standards|
|Keywords||corporate social responsibility global economy international clothing business supply chain management|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alan Muller & Ans Kolk (2009). CSR Performance in Emerging Markets Evidence From Mexico. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):325 - 337.
Diana C. Robertson (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and Different Stages of Economic Development: Singapore, Turkey, and Ethiopia. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):617 - 633.
Francis Weyzig (2009). Political and Economic Arguments for Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysis and a Proposition Regarding the Csr Agenda. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (4):417 - 428.
Geoffrey See (2009). Harmonious Society and Chinese Csr: Is There Really a Link? Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1):1 - 22.
Adam Lindgreen, Valérie Swaen & Wesley J. Johnston (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Investigation of U.S. Organizations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):303 - 323.
Steven Scalet & Thomas F. Kelly (2010). Csr Rating Agencies: What is Their Global Impact? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 94 (1):69 - 88.
Maria Grafström & Karolina Windell (2011). The Role of Infomediaries: CSR in the Business Press During 2000–2009. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 103 (2):221-237.
Gerard I. J. M. Zwetsloot (2003). From Management Systems to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):201 - 207.
Krista Bondy (2008). The Paradox of Power in CSR: A Case Study on Implementation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (2):307 - 323.
Mette Morsing & Francesco Perrini (2009). CSR in SMEs: Do SMEs Matter for the CSR Agenda? Business Ethics 18 (1):1-6.
Added to index2010-02-27
Total downloads14 ( #90,570 of 739,350 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,350 )
How can I increase my downloads?