David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophers' Imprint 12 (19):1-22 (2012)
Philosophers have often claimed that general ideas or representations have their origin in abstraction, but it remains unclear exactly what abstraction as a psychological process consists in. We argue that the Lockean aspiration of using abstraction to explain the origins of all general representations cannot work and that at least some general representations have to be innate. We then offer an explicit framework for understanding abstraction, one that treats abstraction as a computational process that operates over an innate quality space of fine-grained general representations. We argue that this framework has important philosophical implications for the nativism-empiricism dispute, for questions about the acquisition of unstructured representations, and for questions about the relation between human and animal minds.
|Keywords||Abstraction Concepts Conceptual development Nativism Empiricism Locke|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Susan V. Castagnetto (1992). Reid's Answer to Abstract Ideas. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:39-60.
Neil Tennant (2004). A General Theory of Abstraction Operators. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):105-133.
Matti Eklund (2009). Bad Company and Neo-Fregean Philosophy. Synthese 170 (3):393 - 414.
Robin D. Rollinger (2004). Hermann Lotze an Abstraction and Platonic Ideas. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):147-161.
Demetris P. Portides (2005). A Theory of Scientific Model Construction: The Conceptual Process of Abstraction and Concretisation. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 10 (1):67-88.
Rafal Urbaniak (2010). Neologicist nominalism. Studia Logica 96 (2):149-173.
Christopher Gauker (1993). An Extraterrestrial Perspective on Conceptual Development. Mind and Language 8 (1):105-30.
Sergio F. Martínez & Xiang Huang (2011). Epistemic Groundings of Abstraction and Their Cognitive Dimension. Philosophy of Science 78 (3):490-511.
Eric Thomas Updike (2012). Abstraction in Fitch's Basic Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (3):215-243.
Kit Fine (2002). The Limits of Abstraction. Oxford University Press.
Mathias Gutmann & Gerd Hanekamp (1996). Abstraktion Und Ideation — Zur Semantik Chemischer Und Biologischer Grundbegriffe. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 27 (1):29 - 53.
Joongol Kim (2011). A Strengthening of the Caesar Problem. Erkenntnis 75 (1):123-136.
Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (2013). In Defense of Nativism. Philosophical Studies 165 (2):693-718.
Added to index2012-05-13
Total downloads82 ( #16,276 of 1,102,965 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,900 of 1,102,965 )
How can I increase my downloads?