In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings. MIT (1999)
|Abstract||Given the fundamental role that concepts play in theories of cognition, philosophers and cognitive scientists have a common interest in concepts. Nonetheless, there is a great deal of controversy regarding what kinds of things concepts are, how they are structured, and how they are acquired. This chapter offers a detailed high-level overview and critical evaluation of the main theories of concepts and their motivations. Taking into account the various challenges that each theory faces, the chapter also presents a novel approach to concepts that is organized around two ideas. The first is a pluralistic view of differing types of conceptual structure. The second is a model that treats concepts as atomic representations that are linked to various types of conceptual structures.|
|Keywords||concepts prototype theory theory-theory classical theory atomism categorization conceptual pluralism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Concepts. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Jack M. C. Kwong (2007). Is Conceptual Atomism a Plausible Theory of Concepts? Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):413-434.
Eric Margolis (1998). How to Acquire a Concept. Mind and Language 13 (3):347-369.
Muhammad Ali Khalidi (1995). Two Concepts of Concept. Mind and Language 10 (4):402-22.
Albert Newen & Andreas Bartels (2007). Animal Minds and the Possession of Concepts. Philosophical Psychology 20 (3):283 – 308.
Jerry A. Fodor (1998). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford University Press.
Ken Daley (2010). The Structure of Lexical Concepts. Philosophical Studies 150 (3):349 - 372.
Jack M. C. Kwong (2006). Why Concepts Can't Be Theories. Philosophical Explorations 9 (3):309-325.
Katherine Nelson (1998). Beyond Substance Concepts in Cognitive Development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):81-82.
Edouard Machery (2009). Doing Without Concepts. Oxford University Press.
John Jung Park (2013). Prototypes, Exemplars, and Theoretical & Applied Ethics. Neuroethics 6 (2):237-247.
Added to index2010-10-11
Total downloads60 ( #19,222 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,982 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?