David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dialogue 43 (2):281-315 (2004)
I clarify in what sense one might want to claim that thought or language are public. I distinguish among four forms that each of these claims might take, and two general ways of establishing them that might be contemplated. The first infers the public character of thought from the public character of language, and the second infers the latter from the former. I show that neither of these stategies seems to be able to dispense with the claim that thought and language are interdependent, and that the second strategy raises more difficulties than the first. I then examine the reasoning by which Davidson means to establish that thought depends on language. I claim that this reasoning is not conclusive, and that it can be adapted in such a way as to establish aversion of the thesis that thought is public which does not presuppose that language is public, and aversion of the thesis that language is public which does not imply that thought depends on language. I conclude with the suggestion that despite appearances to the contrary Davidson’s doctrine is defensible only if it implies at least the conceivability of intentional systems that would lack language altogether
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Dorit Bar-On (1992). On the Possibility of a Solitary Language. Noûs 26 (1):27-46.
Johannes L. Brandl (ed.) (1989). The Mind of Donald Davidson. Netherlands: Rodopi.
Paul Coates (1996). Current Issues in Idealism. Bristol: Thoemmes.
Donald Davidson (1995). Could There Be a Science of Rationality? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (1):1-16.
Donald Davidson (1991). Epistemology Externalized. Dialectica 45 (2‐3):191-202.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Henry Jackman (2003). Expression, Thought, and Language. Philosophia 31 (1-2):33-54.
Kristin Andrews (2002). Interpreting Autism: A Critique of Davidson on Thought and Language. Philosophical Psychology 15 (3):317-332.
Christopher Gauker (2002). No Conceptual Thought Without Language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):687-687.
Martin Lenz (2008). Why is Thought Linguistic? Ockham's Two Conceptions of the Intellect. Vivarium 46 (3):302-317.
Agustín Vicente & Fernando MartínezManrique (2005). Semantic Underdetermination and the Cognitive Uses of Language. Mind and Language 20 (5):537–558.
Donald Davidson (1999). The Emergence of Thought. Erkenntnis 51 (1):511-21.
Ruth G. Millikan (2003). In Defense of Public Language. In Louise M. Antony & H. Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and His Critics. Blackwell.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #165,166 of 1,096,702 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #105,642 of 1,096,702 )
How can I increase my downloads?