Re-Enfranchising Art: Feminist Interventions in the Theory of Art

Hypatia 5 (2):91 - 106 (1990)
Feminist analyses of the roles gender has played in art lead to an alternative theory that emphasizes art's complex interactions with culture(s) rather than the autonomy within culture claimed for it by formalism. Focusing on the visual arts, I extrapolate the new theory from feminist research and compare it with formalist precepts. Sharing Arthur Danto's concern that art has been disenfranchised in the twentieth century by its preoccupation with theory, I claim that feminist thought re-enfranchises art by revisioning its relationship to its contexts.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/3810158
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Arthur Danto (1964). The Artworld. Journal of Philosophy 61 (19):571-584.
Arnold Berleant (1986). The Historicity of Aesthetics — I. British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (2):101-111.
W. K. Wimsatt (1955). The Verbal Icon. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 13 (3):414-414.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

10 ( #227,904 of 1,725,442 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,420 of 1,725,442 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.