David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Owl of Minerva 40 (1):77-114 (2008)
This paper analyzes and compares the doctrines of categories of Aristotle, Kant and Hegel, each of which is first discussed separately. The paper explains the essential double perspective of the problem, showing how a logico-linguistic analysis of the form of rational discourse serves for them as an important clue to ontological problems. Although Aristotle and Kant’s doctrines differ significantly, they both endorse a kind of isomorphism between language/thought and reality. By contrast, Hegel, who takes a critical attitude toward the capability of human language and discursive thinking, rejects the possibility of deriving the structure of reality from the forms of predication or judgment. Nevertheless, the forms of judgment do play an equally crucial role in Hegel’s doctrine, though in a very different way from his predecessors. It is the structural “deficiency” of the judgmental form that turns out to be the driving force for the dialectical movement of the Concept. By shifting the primary concern from the categories themselves to the transitions between them, Hegel opens up the possibility of a dynamic system of categories
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Simon Lumsden (2003). Satisfying the Demands of Reason: Hegel's Conceptualization of Experience. Topoi 22 (1):41-53.
Karen Ng (2009). Hegel's Logic of Actuality. Review of Metaphysics 63 (1):139-172.
William R. Woodward (2010). Hermann Lotze's Gestalt Metaphysics in Light of the Schelling and Hegel Renaissance (1838–1841). Idealistic Studies 40 (1/2):163-188.
Paul Redding (2005). Pierre Bourdieu: From Neo-Kantian to Hegelian Critical Social Theory. Critical Horizons 6 (1):183-204.
Jan Westerhoff (2004). The Construction of Ontological Categories. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):595 – 620.
Edward A. Beach (2010). Hegel's Mediated Immediacies. The Owl of Minerva 42 (1-2):153-217.
Ralf M. Bader (2009). Kant and the Categories of Freedom. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (4):799-820.
Ahmad Ighbariah (2012). Between Logic and Mathematics: Al-Kindī's Approach to the Aristotelian Categories. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 22 (1):51-68.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1993). Hegel, Idealism, and Robert Pippin. International Philosophical Quarterly 33 (3):263-272.
Edward C. Halper (2002). The Idealism of Hegel's System. The Owl of Minerva 34 (1):19-58.
Robert Stern (1999). Going Beyond the Kantian Philosophy: On McDowell's Hegelian Critique of Kant. European Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):247–269.
William F. Bristow (2007). Hegel and the Transformation of Philosophical Critique. Oxford University Press.
Jorge J. E. Gracia (2009). Categories and Levels of Reality. Axiomathes 19 (2):179-191.
Michael R. Baumer (1993). Chasing Aristotle's Categories Down the Tree of Grammar. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:341-449.
Christophe Erismann (2007). The Logic of Being: Eriugena's Dialectical Ontology. Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):203-218.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads38 ( #115,703 of 1,938,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #62,638 of 1,938,815 )
How can I increase my downloads?