Technologies of Democracy: Experiments and Demonstrations

Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):649-666 (2011)
Technologies of democracy are instruments based on material apparatus, social practices and expert knowledge that organize the participation of various publics in the definition and treatment of public problems. Using three examples related to the engagement of publics in nanotechnology in France (a citizen conference, a series of public meetings, and an industrial design process), the paper argues that Science and Technology Studies provide useful tools and methods for the analysis of technologies of democracy. Operations of experiments and public demonstrations can be described, as well as controversies about technologies of democracy giving rise to counter-experiments and counter-demonstrations. The political value of the analysis of public engagement lies in the description of processes of stabilization of democratic orders and in the display of potential alternative political arrangements
Keywords Technology of democracy  STS  Public engagement
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-011-9303-1
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,974
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Erik Fisher (2011). Editorial Overview. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):607-620.
Rinie Est (2011). The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
May Thorseth (2008). Reflective Judgment and Enlarged Thinking Online. Ethics and Information Technology 10 (4):221-231.
Andrew Lister (2008). Public Reason and Democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (3):273-289.
Colin Farrelly (forthcoming). Deliberative Democracy and Nanotechnology. Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

53 ( #63,570 of 1,725,834 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,700 of 1,725,834 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.