Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):649-666 (2011)
|Abstract||Technologies of democracy are instruments based on material apparatus, social practices and expert knowledge that organize the participation of various publics in the definition and treatment of public problems. Using three examples related to the engagement of publics in nanotechnology in France (a citizen conference, a series of public meetings, and an industrial design process), the paper argues that Science and Technology Studies provide useful tools and methods for the analysis of technologies of democracy. Operations of experiments and public demonstrations can be described, as well as controversies about technologies of democracy giving rise to counter-experiments and counter-demonstrations. The political value of the analysis of public engagement lies in the description of processes of stabilization of democratic orders and in the display of potential alternative political arrangements|
|Keywords||Technology of democracy STS Public engagement|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alison Mohr (2011). Publics in the Making: Mediating Different Methods of Engagement and the Publics These Construct. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):667-672.
May Thorseth (2008). Reflective Judgment and Enlarged Thinking Online. Ethics and Information Technology 10 (4):221-231.
Joshua Cohen (2009). Philosophy, Politics, Democracy: Selected Essays. Harvard University Press.
Andrew Lister (2008). Public Reason and Democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (3):273-289.
Jason W. Patton (2000). Protecting Privacy in Public? Surveillance Technologies and the Value of Public Places. Ethics and Information Technology 2 (3):181-187.
Adam S. Plotkin (1996). The First Amendment and Democracy: The Challenge of New Technology. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 11 (4):236 – 245.
Noëlle McAfee (2008). Democracy and the Political Unconscious. Columbia University Press.
Ulrike Felt & Maximilian Fochler (2010). Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-Scribing Publics in Public Engagement. Minerva 48 (3):219-238.
Trond Åm (2011). Trust in Nanotechnology? On Trust as Analytical Tool in Social Research on Emerging Technologies. Nanoethics 5 (1):15-28.
Trond Ã…M. (2011). Trust in Nanotechnology? On Trust as Analytical Tool in Social Research on Emerging Technologies. Nanoethics 5 (1):15-28.
M. Zimmer (2005). Surveillance, Privacy and the Ethics of Vehicle Safety Communication Technologies. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):201-210.
Daniel Sperling (2012). Socializing the Public: Invoking Hannah Arendt's Critique of Modernity to Evaluate Reproductive Technologies. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):53-60.
Added to index2011-08-19
Total downloads46 ( #28,149 of 722,933 )
Recent downloads (6 months)32 ( #3,698 of 722,933 )
How can I increase my downloads?