- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Technology report: Building legal practice systems with today's commercial authoring tools [Book Review]
Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):87-102 (1992)
Abstract
Document assembly and other substantive legal practice applications are the most knowledge-intense forms of software now widely available in the legal technology marketplace. This article provides an illustrative look at two contemporary practice system engines-CAPS and Scrivener-and examines their relevance for AI-and-law researchers.My notes
Similar books and articles
The european conflicts guide.Robin Widdison, Francis Pritchard & William Robinson - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (4):291-304.
Technology report: Work product retrieval systems in today's law offices. [REVIEW]Marc Lauritsen - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (4):287-304.
Analytical jurisprudence and the concept of commercial law.John Linarelli - 2009 - Penn State Law Review 114 (1):119-215.
Knowledge tools for legal knowledge tool makers.John Hokkanen & Marc Lauritsen - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (4):295-302.
Legal positivism and the separation of existence and validity.Matthew Grellette - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (1):22-40.
Legal ethics: a comparative study.Geoffrey C. Hazard - 2004 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Angelo Dondi.
Representing and using legal knowledge in integrated decision support systems: Datalex workstations. [REVIEW]Graham Greenleaf, Andrew Mowbray & Peter Dijk - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (1-2):97-142.
An australian perspective on research and development required for the construction of applied legal decision support systems.John Zeleznikow - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (4):237-260.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
35 (#431,398)
6 months
7 (#339,156)
2009-01-28
Downloads
35 (#431,398)
6 months
7 (#339,156)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: overviews.Michał Araszkiewicz, Trevor Bench-Capon, Enrico Francesconi, Marc Lauritsen & Antonino Rotolo - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 30 (4):593-610.
AI in law practice? So far, not much.Anja Oskamp & Marc Lauritsen - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (4):227-236.
Representing and using legal knowledge in integrated decision support systems: DataLex WorkStations.Graham Greenleaf, Andrew Mowbray & Peter van Dijk - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (1-2):97-142.
The representation of legal contracts.Aspassia Daskalopulu & Marek Sergot - 1997 - AI and Society 11 (1-2):6-17.
Rule-based XML.Go Eguchi & Laurence L. Leff - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (4):283-294.
References found in this work
R1: A rule-based configurer of computer systems.John McDermott - 1982 - Artificial Intelligence 19 (1):39-88.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-sqt28 uwo