David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (2):159-182 (2009)
This paper focuses on the emergent neo-Jamesian perspective concerning the phenomenology of art and aesthetic experience. Starting from the distinction between nucleus and fringe in the stream of thought described by William James, it can be argued that our appreciation of a work of art is guided by a vague and blurred perception of a much more powerful content, of which we are not fully aware. Accordingly, a work of art is seen as a kind of metaphor of our mental life, objectified to be able to reach out to a much larger audience. However, it is a “realistic” theory rooted in evolutionary psychology, which claims that our mind developed within a framework shaped by environmental pressures. The aesthetics illustrated by several novelists develops a paradigm for this theory. The search for the neuronal correlates of stream of consciousness allows to make a comparison with the recent findings of neuroaesthetics and to reject its claim that it is unnecessary to take phenomenology and psychology into account.
|Keywords||Art Fringe Nucleus James Neuroaesthetics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Bernard J. Baars (1993). Putting the Focus on the Fringe: Three Empirical Cases. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (2):126-36.
Brian Boyd (1998). Jane, Meet Charles: Literature, Evolution, and Human Nature. Philosophy and Literature 22 (1):1-30.
Joseph Carroll (1995). Evolution and Literary Theory. Human Nature 6 (2):119-134.
Roberto Casati & Alessandro Pignocchi (2007). Mirror and Canonical Neurons Are Not Constitutive of Aesthetic Responses. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (10):000-000.
Wallace L. Chafe (2000). A Linguist's Perspective on William James and "the Stream of Thought.&Quot;. Consciousness and Cognition 9 (4):618-628.
Citations of this work BETA
Andrea Lavazza & Riccardo Manzotti (2013). An Externalist Approach to Creativity: Discovery Versus Recombination. Mind and Society 12 (1):61-72.
Similar books and articles
Lars Aagaard-Mogensen (ed.) (1976). Culture and Art: An Anthology. Humanities Press.
Paul Crowther (2007). Defining Art, Creating the Canon: Artistic Value in an Era of Doubt. Oxford University Press.
Keith Lehrer (2012). Art, Self, and Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Clementina Red (2012). Specular Phenomenology: Art and Art Criticism. Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 17 (2):248-260.
Harold Osborne (1972). Aesthetics. London,Oxford University Press.
Brandon Cooke (2007). Imagining Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):29-45.
Stephen Davies (2007/2010). Philosophical Perspectives on Art. New York;Oxford University Press.
James Grant (2011). Metaphor and Criticism BSA Prize Essay, 2010. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):237-257.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads51 ( #34,000 of 1,100,147 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #127,215 of 1,100,147 )
How can I increase my downloads?