Philosophy of Science 75 (5):682-696 (2008)
|Abstract||The Boltzmann and Gibbs approaches to statistical mechanics have very different definitions of equilibrium and entropy. The problems associated with this are discussed, and it is suggested that they can be resolved, to produce a version of statistical mechanics incorporating both approaches, by redefining equilibrium not as a binary property (being/not being in equilibrium) but as a continuous property (degrees of equilibrium) measured by the Boltzmann entropy and by introducing the idea of thermodynamic‐like behavior for the Boltzmann entropy. The Kac ring model is used as an example to test the proposals. †To contact the author, please write to: Department of Mathematics, King’s College, London WC2R 2LS, U.K.; e‐mail: email@example.com.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Massimiliano Badino, Was There a Statistical Turn ? The Interaction Between Mechanics and Probability in Boltzmann's Theory of Non Equilibrium (1872-1877). [REVIEW]
Olimpia Lombardi & Martín Labarca (2005). Los Enfoques de Boltzmann y Gibbs Frente Al Problema de la Irreversibilidad (Boltzmann and Gibbs Approaches in the Problem of Irreversibility). Crítica 37 (111):39 - 81.
Stephen Leeds (1989). Malament and Zabell on Gibbs Phase Averaging. Philosophy of Science 56 (2):325-340.
D. Costantini & U. Garibaldi (1997). A Probabilistic Foundation of Elementary Particle Statistics. Part I. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 28 (4):483-506.
Itamar Pitowsky (2006). On the Definition of Equilibrium. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (3):431-438.
Janneke Van Lith (1999). Reconsidering the Concept of Equilibrium in Classical Statistical Mechanics. Philosophy of Science 66:S107 - S118.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #49,809 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?