David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 89 (2):253 - 271 (1991)
If quantum mechanics (QM) is to be taken as an atomistic theory with the elementary particles as atoms (an ATEP), then the elementary particlcs must be individuals. There must then be, for each elementary particle a, a property being identical with a that a alone has. But according to QM, elementary particles of the same kind share all physical properties. Thus, if QM is an ATEP, identity is a metaphysical but not a physical property. That has unpalatable consequences. Dropping the assumption that QM is an ATEP makes it possible to replace the assumption that elementary particles are individuals with the assumption that there are various kinds of elementary stuff that have smallest quantities — the smallest quantity of light, for example, is a photon. The problems about identity disappear, and the explanatory virtues of an ATEP are maintained.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
P. A. M. Dirac (1930). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford, the Clarendon Press.
Steven French & Michael Redhead (1988). Quantum Physics and the Identity of Indiscernibles. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (2):233-246.
Allen Ginsberg (1984). On a Paradox in Quantum Mechanics. Synthese 61 (3):325 - 349.
Willard van Orman Quine (1996). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press.
Willard Van Orman Quine, Patricia Smith Churchland & Dagfinn Føllesdal (2013). Word and Object. The Mit Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Lucía Lewowicz & Olimpia Lombardi (2013). Stuff Versus Individuals. Foundations of Chemistry 15 (1):65-77.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Maxwell (1976). Towards a Micro Realistic Version of Quantum Mechanics, Part I. Foundations of Physics 6 (3):275-292.
Michael Redhead & Paul Teller (1992). Particle Labels and the Theory of Indistinguishable Particles in Quantum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (2):201-218.
William Demopoulos (2004). Elementary Propositions and Essentially Incomplete Knowledge: A Framework for the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Noûs 38 (1):86–109.
Adonai S. Sant'anna (2000). Elementary Particles, Hidden Variables, and Hidden Predicates. Synthese 125 (1-2):233 - 245.
Pedro L. Garrido, Sheldon Goldstein, Jani Lukkarinen & Roderich Tumulka, Paradoxical Reflection in Quantum Mechanics.
Robert C. Hilborn & Candice L. Yuca (2002). Identical Particles in Quantum Mechanics Revisited. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (3):355-389.
Kostas Gavroglu (1989). Simplicity and Observability: When Are Particles Elementary? Synthese 79 (3):89 - 100.
Don Howard, Are Elementary Particles Individuals? A Critical Appreciation of Steven French and Décio Krause's Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis.
Rollin W. Workman (1959). Is Indeterminism Supported by Quantum Theory? Philosophy of Science 26 (3):251-259.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #70,286 of 1,099,918 )
Recent downloads (6 months)20 ( #10,304 of 1,099,918 )
How can I increase my downloads?