David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Techne 12 (1):48-64 (2008)
Ontology tends to be held in deep suspicion by many currently engaged in the study of technology. The aim of this paper is to suggest an ontology of technology that will be both acceptable to ontology’s critics and useful for those engaged with technology. By drawing upon recent developments in social ontology and extending these into the technological realm it is possible to sustain a conception of technology that is not only irreducibly social but able to give due weight to those features that distinguish technical objects from other artefacts. These distinctions, however, require talk of different kinds of causal powers and different types of activity aimed at harnessing such powers. Such discussions are largely absent in recent technological debates, but turn out to be significant both for ongoing technology research and for the recasting of some more traditional debates within the philosophy of technology
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Clive Lawson (2010). Technology and the Extension of Human Capabilities. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40 (2):207-223.
Steffen Steinert (forthcoming). Taking Stock of Extension Theory of Technology. Philosophy and Technology:1-18.
Kay Mathiesen (2014). Human Rights for the Digital Age. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 29 (1):2-18.
Reijo Miettinen, Sami Paavola & Pasi Pohjola (2012). From Habituality to Change: Contribution of Activity Theory and Pragmatism to Practice Theories. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (3):345-360.
Philip Boucher (2011). What Next After Determinism in the Ontology of Technology? Distributing Responsibility in the Biofuel Debate. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):525-538.
Similar books and articles
Clive Lawson (2007). Technology, Technological Determinism, and the Transformational Model of Technical Activity. In Clive Lawson, John Latsis & Nuno Martins (eds.), Contributions to Social Ontology. Routledge 32--49.
Mincho Hadjiski & Veselin Petrov (eds.) (2008). Ontologies: Philosophical and Technological Problems: Proceedings of Solon - Sofia Lectures of Ontology, October 2007. Prof. Marin Drinov Academic Publishing House.
Zhouying Jin (2011). Global Technological Change: From Hard Technology to Soft Technology. Intellect.
Arie Rip (2009). Technology as Prospective Ontology. Synthese 168 (3):405 - 422.
Tracy Colony (2009). Concerning Technology. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):23-34.
Dana S. Belu & Andrew Feenberg (2010). Heidegger's Aporetic Ontology of Technology. Inquiry 53 (1):1-19.
Gevork Hartoonian (1994). Ontology of Construction: On Nihilism of Technology in Theories of Modern Architecture. Cambridge University Press.
Bjørn Hofmann (2002). Technological Medicine and the Autonomy of Man. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):157-167.
Lucas D. Introna (2007). Maintaining the Reversibility of Foldings: Making the Ethics (Politics) of Information Technology Visible. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1):11-25.
Val Dusek (2006). Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Oxfordblackwell Pub..
Andrew Feenberg (2002). Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. Oxford University Press.
Antony J. Puddephatt (2005). Mead has Never Been Modern: Using Meadian Theory to Extend the Constructionist Study of Technology. Social Epistemology 19 (4):357 – 380.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads26 ( #129,915 of 1,781,456 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #167,885 of 1,781,456 )
How can I increase my downloads?